First experience of autonomous, un-supervised treatment planning integrated in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy and delivered to a patient with prostate cancer

被引:25
作者
Kuenzel, Luise A. [1 ]
Nachbar, Marcel [1 ]
Hagmueller, Markus [1 ]
Gani, Cihan [2 ]
Boeke, Simon [2 ]
Zips, Daniel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thorwarth, Daniela [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Tubingen, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Autonomous radiotherapy planning; Automatic segmentation; MR-Linac; MR-guided radiotherapy; Artificial intelligence; Particle swarm optimization; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; ORGANS; SEGMENTATION; QUALITY; ATLAS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Currently clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning consists of a multi-step routine procedure requiring human interaction which often results in a time-consuming and fragmented process with limited robustness. Here we present an autonomous un-supervised treatment planning approach, integrated as basis for online adaptive magnetic resonance guided RT (MRgRT), which was delivered to a prostate cancer patient as a first-in-human experience. Materials and methods: For an intermediate risk prostate cancer patient OARs and targets were automatically segmented using a deep learning-based software and logical volume operators. A baseline plan for the 1.5 T MR-Linac (20x3 Gy) was automatically generated using particle swarm optimization (PSO) without any human interaction. Plan quality was evaluated by predefined dosimetric criteria including appropriate tolerances. Online plan adaptation during clinical MRgRT was defined as first checkpoint for human interaction. Results: OARs and targets were successfully segmented (3 min) and used for automatic plan optimization (300 min). The autonomous generated plan satisfied 12/16 dosimetric criteria, however all remained within tolerance. Without prior human validation, this baseline plan was successfully used during online MRgRT plan adaptation, where 14/16 criteria were fulfilled. As postulated, human interaction was necessary only during plan adaptation. Conclusion: Autonomous, un-supervised data preparation and treatment planning was first-in-human shown to be feasible for adaptive MRgRT and successfully applied. The checkpoint for first human intervention was at the time of online MRgRT plan adaptation. Autonomous planning reduced the time delay between simulation and start of RT and may thus allow for real-time MRgRT applications in the future. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 159 (2021) 197-201 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Archambault Y., 2020, MED PHYS INT J, V8, P77
  • [2] Blanchard P, 2020, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V108, pE780
  • [3] Machine learning applications in radiation oncology: Current use and needs to support clinical implementation
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Dinkla, Anna M.
    Vandewinckele, Liesbeth
    Crijns, Wouter
    Claessens, Michael
    Verellen, Dirk
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 144 - 148
  • [4] Buschmann M, 2018, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V194, P333, DOI 10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of atlas- and deep learning-based automatic segmentation of multiple organs and clinical target volumes for breast cancer
    Choi, Min Seo
    Choi, Byeong Su
    Chung, Seung Yeun
    Kim, Nalee
    Chun, Jaehee
    Kim, Yong Bae
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Kim, Jin Sung
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 153 : 139 - 145
  • [6] Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
  • [7] Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
    Dearnaley, David
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Mossop, Helen
    Khoo, Vincent
    Birtle, Alison
    Bloomfield, David
    Graham, John
    Kirkbride, Peter
    Logue, John
    Malik, Zafar
    Money-Kyrle, Julian
    O'Sullivan, Joe M.
    Panades, Miguel
    Parker, Chris
    Patterson, Helen
    Scrase, Christopher
    Staffurth, John
    Stockdale, Andrew
    Tremlett, Jean
    Bidmead, Margaret
    Mayles, Helen
    Naismith, Olivia
    South, Chris
    Gao, Annie
    Cruickshank, Clare
    Hassan, Shama
    Pugh, Julia
    Griffin, Clare
    Hall, Emma
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) : 1047 - 1060
  • [8] Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of targets and organs-at-risk for magnetic resonance imaging only planning of prostate radiotherapy
    Elguindi, Sharif
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Jiang, Jue
    Veeraraghavan, Harini
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Hunt, Margie A.
    Tyagi, Neelam
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 : 80 - 86
  • [9] Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique
    Fan, Jiawei
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Chen, Zhi
    Hu, Chaosu
    Zhang, Zhen
    Hu, Weigang
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) : 370 - 381
  • [10] A novel MRI segmentation method using CNN-based correction network for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Fu, Yabo
    Mazur, Thomas R.
    Wu, Xue
    Liu, Shi
    Chang, Xiao
    Lu, Yonggang
    Li, H. Harold
    Kim, Hyun
    Roach, Michael C.
    Henke, Lauren
    Yang, Deshan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5129 - 5137