A gravity model integrating high-speed rail and seismic-hazard mitigation through land-use planning: Application to California development

被引:24
作者
Wang, Chih-Hao [1 ]
Chen, Na [2 ]
Chan, Shih-Liang [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fresno, Dept Geog & City & Reg Planning, 2555 E San Ramon M-S SB69, Fresno, CA 93740 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, City & Reg Planning, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Real Estate & Built Environm, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
High-speed rail; Resilience; Seismic hazard; Vulnerability; Urban model; Land-use planning; URBAN-DEVELOPMENT; LOS-ANGELES; TRANSPORTATION; ACCESSIBILITY; RESILIENCE; EARTHQUAKE; LOCATION; COUNTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.009
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
California high-speed rail (CaIHSR) will be changing the current regional and urban structure because of the improved transportation mobility and accessibility. It has been a focus of interest to see whether high-speed rail will enhance the polarization of first-tier station cities or reduce the gap between those and lower-tier cities. In California, the two largest cities (i.e., San Francisco and Los Angeles) are under great seismic threat. Planners should be able to assess CaIHSR impacts and the resulting seismic risks because of disproportionally allocating future growth to seismic hazardous locations. Urban models can help' develop knowledge about urban and regional system behavior, since CaIHSR does not yet exist. A gravity model, TELUM, is therefore used to understand the effects of CaIHSR and seismic hazard mitigation on the allocation of future development over six 5-year increments from 2015 to 2040. Several scenarios are considered: 1) natural growth; 2) impact of CaIHSR; 3) impacts of both seismic hazard mitigation and CalHSR. The first scenario shows that TELUM tends to result in spatial polarization. Under the second scenario, CaIHSR enhances the polarization of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Fresno metropolitan areas, due to their economic strength. The third scenario is to examine whether CaIHSR effects increase seismic risks. The results show that a seismic mitigation plan with zero-development policy can improve urban resilience. From the perspective at the regional level, possible seismic mitigation approaches are discussed, through land-use and transportation planning, to guide future growth to more seismic-resistant locations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Abraham J., 2003, UCDITSRR0332
  • [2] Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan
    Ainuddin, Syed
    Routray, Jayant Kumar
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 63 (02) : 909 - 937
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2009-Risk and poverty in a changing climate: Invest today for a safer tomorrow
  • [4] Borning A, 2008, INTEGR SER INFORM SY, V17, P439
  • [5] Burby RaymondJ., 2000, NAT HAZARDS REV, V1, P99, DOI https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)
  • [6] Application of TELUM by the Pikes Peak, Colorado, Area Council of Governments Lessons Learned in Colorado Springs
    Casper, Craig T.
    O'Brien, Jason
    Lupa, Mary R.
    Dimitrijevic, Branislav
    de Araujo, Maureen Paz
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2119) : 45 - 53
  • [7] Center for Transportation Analysis, 2011, COUNT TO COUNT DIST
  • [8] The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA
    Cutter, Susan L.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 80 (02) : 741 - 758
  • [9] Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
  • [10] Dittmar H., 2004, NEW TRANSIT TOWN BES, P2