A hybrid approach for aspect-oriented business process modeling

被引:10
作者
Jalali, Amin [1 ]
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria [2 ]
Reijers, Hajo A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholms Univ, DSV, Postbox 7003, S-16407 Kista, Sweden
[2] Univ Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
aspect orientation; business process modeling; cross-cutting concerns; declarative rules; hybrid models; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; SYNTAX MODIFICATIONS; COMPLEXITY; PARADIGM; AO4BPEL; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1002/smr.1931
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Separation of concerns has long been an important strategy to deal with complexity when developing a system. Some concerns (like security) are scattered through the whole system, and different modules are tangled to such concerns. These concerns are known as cross-cutting concerns. When the system in question is a business process, cross-cutting concerns are aimed at being encapsulated by Aspect-Oriented Business Process Modeling. However, the state-of-the-art techniques in this field lack efficient mechanisms that (1) support composition of cross-cutting concerns that can be defined in parallel to (a part of) a process model and (2) enable specifying both mandatory and optional cross-cutting concerns. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a new Aspect-Oriented Business Process Modeling approach. The approach is hybrid since it is based on declarative rules to relate imperative cross-cutting concerns and imperative business process models. The approach is explained, formally grounded with precise semantics, and used accordingly to implement the artifacts that support modeling and enactment of business processes in the proposed fashion as a proof of concept. In addition, the approach is evaluated on the basis of the Technology Acceptance Model during a workshop session. The result shows that participants perceived the approach usable and easy to use.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Requirement And Interaction Analysis using Aspect-Oriented Modeling. [J].
Mohite, Sagar ;
Phalnikar, Rashmi ;
Joshi, Manjusha ;
Joshi, S. D. ;
Jadhav, Swati .
SOUVENIR OF THE 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IACC), 2014, :1448-1453
[22]   A Survey on UML-Based Aspect-Oriented Design Modeling [J].
Wimmer, Manuel ;
Schauerhuber, Andrea ;
Kappel, Gerti ;
Retschitzegger, Werner ;
Schwinger, Wieland ;
Kapsammer, Elisabeth .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2011, 43 (04)
[23]   Aspect-oriented reverse engineering [J].
Foumani, Amir Abdollahi ;
Constantinides, Constantinos .
WMSCI 2005: 9TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, 2005, :253-260
[24]   Aspect-Oriented Ontology Development [J].
Schaefermerier, Ralph .
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS, BIS 2013, 2013, 160 :208-219
[25]   A CPN Based Method for Aspect-Oriented Modeling and Analysis of Fault Tolerance [J].
Sun, Xiaoxing ;
Yu, Huiqun ;
Liang, Honghao .
ADVANCED MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING MATERIALS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 457-458 :891-898
[26]   Aspect-oriented software reverse engineering [J].
苏旸 ;
李凡 ;
胡圣明 ;
陈平 .
JournalofShanghaiUniversity, 2006, (05) :402-408
[27]   ASPECT-ORIENTED FORMAL MODELING: (ASPECTZ plus OBJECT-Z) = OOASPECTZ [J].
Vidal Silva, Cristian ;
Villarroel, Rodolfo ;
Schmal Simon, Rodolfo ;
Saens, Rodrigo ;
Tigero, Tamara ;
Del Rio, Carolina .
COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2015, 34 (05) :996-1016
[28]   Static Weaving in Aspect Oriented Business Process Management [J].
Jalali, Amin .
CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2015, 2015, 9381 :548-557
[29]   Aspect-Oriented Refactoring of Legacy Applications: An Evaluation [J].
Mortensen, Michael ;
Ghosh, Sudipto ;
Bieman, James M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2012, 38 (01) :118-140
[30]   An Overview on Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering Area [J].
Parreira Junior, Paulo Afonso ;
Penteado, Rosangela Dellosso .
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ICEIS 2014, 2015, 227 :244-264