The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: A meta-analysis

被引:426
作者
Debrezion, Ghebreegziabiher [1 ]
Pels, Eric [1 ]
Rietveld, Piet [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
property value; railway station; accessibility; light railways; heavy railway/metro; commuter railway; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Railway stations function as nodes in transport networks and places in an urban environment. They have accessibility and environmental impacts, which contribute to property value. The literature on the effects of railway stations on property value is mixed in its finding in respect to the impact magnitude and direction, ranging from a negative to an insignificant or a positive impact. This paper attempts to explain the variation in the findings by meta-analytical procedures. Generally the variations are attributed to the nature of data, particular spatial characteristics, temporal effects and methodology. Railway station proximity is addressed from two spatial considerations: a local station effect measuring the effect for properties with in 1/4 mile range and a global station effect measuring the effect of coming 250 m closer to the station. We find that the effect of railway stations on commercial property value mainly takes place at short distances. Commercial properties within 1/4 mile rang are 12.2% more expensive than residential properties. Where the price gap between the railway station zone and the rest is about 4.2% for the average residence, it is about 16.4% for the average commercial property. At longer distances the effect on residential property values dominate. We find that for every 250 m a residence is located closer to a station its price is 2.3% higher than commercial properties. Commuter railway stations have a consistently higher positive impact on the property value compared to light and heavy railway/Metro stations. The inclusion of other accessibility variables (such as highways) in the models reduces the level of reported railway station impact.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 180
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]  
NELSON AC, 1998, TRANSP RES BOARD 77
[42]  
Nelson Arthur, 1992, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1359, P127
[43]  
*NEORAIL 2, 2001, EFF RAIL TRANS PROP
[44]   HEDONIC PRICES AND IMPLICIT MARKETS - PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION IN PURE COMPETITION [J].
ROSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (01) :34-55
[45]  
SMITH J, 2001, DOES TRANSIT RAISE S
[46]   CAN MARKETS VALUE AIR-QUALITY - A METAANALYSIS OF HEDONIC PROPERTY VALUE MODELS [J].
SMITH, VK ;
HUANG, JC .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1995, 103 (01) :209-227
[47]  
VOITH R, 1991, AREUEA J, V19, P117
[48]   CHANGING CAPITALIZATION OF CBD-ORIENTED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS - EVIDENCE FROM PHILADELPHIA, 1970-1988 [J].
VOITH, R .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1993, 33 (03) :361-376
[49]  
Von Thunen J.H., 1863, ISOLIERTE STAAT BEZI
[50]  
WEINBERGER R, 2001, LILGHT RAIL PROXIMIT