Robotic-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy within the prospective multicenter German da Vinci Xi registry trial

被引:14
|
作者
Egberts, Jan-Hendrik [1 ,2 ]
Welsch, Thilo [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Merboth, Felix [3 ]
Korn, Sandra [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Praetorius, Christian [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Stange, Daniel E. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Distler, Marius [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Biebl, Matthias [9 ]
Pratschke, Johann [9 ]
Nickel, Felix [10 ]
Mueller-Stich, Beat [10 ]
Perez, Daniel [11 ]
Izbicki, Jakob R. [11 ]
Becker, Thomas [1 ]
Weitz, Juergen [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Kurt Semm Ctr Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Dept Gen Visceral Thorac Transplantat & Pediat Su, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Israelit Krankenhaus Hamburg, Dept Surg, D-22297 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Visceral Thorac & Vasc Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT UCC, Dresden, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med, Dresden, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
[8] Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf HZDR, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[9] Charite, Dept Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[10] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[11] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Gen Visceral & Thorac Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
RAMIE; Multicenter; Ivor Lewis; Esophagectomy; Leaning curve; CUSUM analysis; CLAVIEN-DINDO CLASSIFICATION; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; CANCER; CUSUM;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-022-02520-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has become one standard approach for the operative treatment of esophageal tumors at specialized centers. Here, we report the results of a prospective multicenter registry for standardized RAMIE. Methods The German da Vinci Xi registry trial included all consecutive patients who underwent RAMIE at five tertiary university centers between Oct 17, 2017, and Jun 5, 2020. RAMIE was performed according to a standard technique using an intrathoracic circular stapled esophagogastrostomy. Results A total of 220 patients were included. The median age was 64 years. Total minimally invasive RAMIE was accomplished in 85.9%; hybrid resection with robotic-assisted thoracic approach was accomplished in an additional 11.4%. A circular stapler size of >= 28 mm was used in 84%, and the median blood loss and operative time were 200 (IQR: 80-400) ml and 425 (IQR: 335-527) min, respectively. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 13.2% (n=29), whereas the two centers with >70 cases each had rates of 7.0% and 12.0%. Pneumonia occurred in 19.5% of patients, and the 90-day mortality was 3.6%. Cumulative sum analysis of the operative time indicated the end of the learning curve after 22 cases. Conclusions High-quality multicenter registry data confirm that RAMIE is a safe procedure and can be reproduced with acceptable leak rates in a multicenter setting. The learning curve is comparably low for experienced robotic surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1419
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Worldwide Techniques and Outcomes in Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) Results From the Multicenter International Registry
    Kingma, B. Feike
    Grimminger, Peter P.
    van der Sluis, Pieter C.
    van Det, Marc J.
    Kouwenhoven, Ewout A.
    Chao, Yin-Kai
    Tsai, Chun-Yi
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Luketich, James D.
    Haveman, Jan W.
    van Etten, Boudewijn
    Chiu, Philip W.
    Chan, Shannon M.
    Rouanet, Philippe
    Mourregot, Anne
    Hoelzen, Jens-Peter
    Sallum, Rubens A.
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
    Benedix, Frank
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Perez, Daniel
    Jansen, Kristina
    Hubka, Michal
    Low, Donald E.
    Biebl, Matthias
    Pratschke, Johann
    Turner, Paul
    Pursnani, Kish
    Chaudry, Asif
    Smith, Myles
    Mazza, Elena
    Strignano, Paolo
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (05) : E386 - E392
  • [32] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy With Real-Time Perfusion Assessment
    Hodari, Arielle
    Park, Ko Un
    Lace, Brian
    Tsiouris, Athanasios
    Hammoud, Zane
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 100 (03) : 947 - 953
  • [33] Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution
    Ekeke, Chigozirim N.
    Kuiper, Gino M.
    Luketich, James D.
    Ruppert, Kristine M.
    Copelli, Susan J.
    Baker, Nicholas
    Levy, Ryan M.
    Awais, Omar
    Christie, Neil A.
    Dhupar, Rajeev
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (02) : 374 - +
  • [34] Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy)
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Xiaobin
    Li, Bin
    Li, Zhigang
    Sun, Yifeng
    Mao, Teng
    Hua, Rong
    Yang, Yu
    Guo, Xufeng
    He, Yi
    Li, Hecheng
    Chen, Hezhong
    Tan, Lijie
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [35] Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Rizk, Nabil P.
    Goldman, Debra A.
    Sima, Camelia
    Tan, Kay See
    Bains, Manjit S.
    Adusumilli, Prasad S.
    Molena, Daniela
    Bott, Matthew
    Atkinson, Thomas
    Jones, David R.
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 108 (03) : 920 - 928
  • [36] Two-Year Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy
    Vimolratana, Marc
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Goldman, Debra A.
    Rizk, Nabil P.
    Tan, Kay See
    Bains, Manjit S.
    Adusumilli, Prasad S.
    Sihag, Smita
    Isbell, James M.
    Huang, James
    Park, Bernard J.
    Molena, Daniela
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    Jones, David R.
    Bott, Matthew J.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (03) : 880 - 889
  • [37] Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis
    Alida, Finze
    Johanna, Betzler
    Svetlana, Hetjens
    Christoph, Reissfelder
    Mirko, Otto
    Susanne, Blank
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (05) : 1831 - 1838
  • [38] Controversies in the management of the pylorus among patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Creden, Samuel P.
    Groth, Shawn S.
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2024, 8
  • [39] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Jin, Dacheng
    Yao, Liang
    Yu, Jun
    Liu, Rong
    Guo, Tiankang
    Yang, Kehu
    Gou, Yunjiu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 15 (03)
  • [40] Enhanced short-term outcomes after full robotic-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis procedure compared to the hybrid approach
    A. Bourgeois
    C. Honoré
    V. Boige
    M. Gelli
    I. Sourrouille
    E. Fernandez de Sevilla
    M. Faron
    N. Bigé
    S. Suria
    L. Benhaim
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 19 (1)