Association Between Incomplete Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Survival for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

被引:20
作者
Freischlag, Kyle [1 ]
Sun, Zhifei [2 ]
Adam, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Kim, Jina [2 ]
Palta, Manisha [3 ]
Czito, Brian G. [3 ]
Migaly, John [2 ]
Mantyh, Christopher R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, 800 Alexan Dr,Ste 105, Durham, NC 27707 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Surg, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM RADIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; INSURANCE STATUS; BREAST-CANCER; CARCINOMA; RADIATION; THERAPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0010
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Failing to complete chemotherapy adversely affects survival in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the effect of incomplete delivery of neoadjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine whether incomplete radiotherapy delivery is associated with worse clinical outcomes and survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data on 17 600 patients with stage II to III rectal adenocarcinoma from the 2006-2012 National Cancer Database who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection were included. Multivariable regression methods were used to compare resection margin positivity, permanent colostomy rate, 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, and overall survival between patients who received complete (45.0-50.4 Gy) and incomplete (<45.0 Gy) doses of radiation as preoperative therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was overall survival; short-term perioperative and oncologic outcomes encompassing margin positivity, permanent ostomy rate, postoperative readmission, and postoperative mortality were also assessed. RESULTS Among 17 600 patients included, 10 862 were men, with an overall median age of 59 years (range, 51-68 years). Of these, 874 patients (5.0%) received incomplete doses of neoadjuvant radiation. The median radiation dose received among those who did not achieve complete dosing was 34.2 Gy (interquartile range, 19.8-40.0 Gy). Female sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.81; P < .001) and receiving radiotherapy at a different hospital than the one where surgery was performed (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.85; P < .001) were independent predictors of failing to achieve complete dosing; private insurance status was predictive of completing radiotherapy (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21; P = .004). At 5-year follow-up, overall survival was improved among patients who received a complete course of radiotherapy (3086 [estimated survival probability, 73.2%] vs 133 [63.0%]; P < .001). After adjustment for demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, patients receiving a complete vs incomplete radiation dose had a similar resection margin positivity (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.35; P = .92), permanent colostomy rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70-1.32; P = .81), 30-day readmission rate (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67-1.27; P = .62), and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.33-1.54; P = .41). However, a complete radiation dose had a significantly lower risk of long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Achieving a target radiation dose of 45.0 to 50.4 Gy is associated with a survival benefit in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Aligning all aspects of multimodal oncology care may increase the probability of completing neoadjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 564
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2016, CANC FACTS FIG, V2016, P12
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P1465
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT CANC DAT BAS
[4]   THE RELATION BETWEEN HEALTH-INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH BREAST-CANCER [J].
AYANIAN, JZ ;
KOHLER, BA ;
ABE, T ;
EPSTEIN, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (05) :326-331
[5]   The impact of patient compliance with adjuvant radiotherapy: a comprehensive cohort study [J].
Badakhshi, Harun ;
Gruen, Arne ;
Sehouli, Jalid ;
Budach, Volker ;
Boehmer, Dirk .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2013, 2 (05) :712-717
[6]   Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2015 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines [J].
Benson, Al B., III ;
Venook, Alan P. ;
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios ;
Chan, Emily ;
Chen, Yi-Jen ;
Cooper, Harry S. ;
Engstrom, Paul F. ;
Enzinger, Peter C. ;
Fenton, Moon J. ;
Fuchs, Charles S. ;
Grem, Jean L. ;
Grothey, Axel ;
Hochster, Howard S. ;
Hunt, Steven ;
Kamel, Ahmed ;
Kirilcuk, Natalie ;
Leong, Lucille A. ;
Lin, Edward ;
Messersmith, Wells A. ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Murphy, James D. ;
Nurkin, Steven ;
Rohren, Eric ;
Ryan, David P. ;
Saltz, Leonard ;
Sharma, Sunil ;
Shibata, David ;
Skibber, John M. ;
Sofocleous, Constantinos T. ;
Stoffel, Elena M. ;
Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden ;
Willett, Christopher G. ;
Gregory, Kristina M. ;
Freedman-Cass, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (06) :719-728
[7]   Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation [J].
Bese, Nuran Senel ;
Hendry, Jolyon ;
Jeremic, Branislav .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :654-661
[8]   Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy [J].
Bujko, K ;
Nowacki, MP ;
Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A ;
Michalski, W ;
Bebenek, AB ;
Pudelko, M ;
Kryj, A ;
Oledzki, J ;
Szmeja, J ;
Sluszniak, J ;
Serkies, K ;
Kladny, J ;
Pamucka, A ;
Kukolowicz, P .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 (01) :15-24
[9]   Improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark [J].
Bulow, S. ;
Harling, H. ;
Iversen, L. H. ;
Ladelund, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (07) :E37-E42
[10]  
CEDERMARK B, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2269, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2269::AID-CNCR2820750913>3.0.CO