Measuring peer effects in sales research: a review of challenges and remedies

被引:6
作者
Atefi, Yashar [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pourmasoudi, Mohsen [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, EJ Ourso Coll Business, 2117 Business Educ Complex South, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Univ Houston, CT Bauer Coll Business, MH 375L,4750 Calhoun Rd, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[3] Univ Denver, Daniels Coll Business, Mkt, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[4] Univ Denver, Daniels Coll Business, Sales Leadership Ctr, Denver, CO 80208 USA
关键词
peer effects; reflection; exclusion bias; sales research; survey research; observational studies; PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE; TRAIT COMPETITIVENESS; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; IDENTIFICATION; SALESPEOPLE; INTELLIGENCE; LEADERSHIP; DIFFUSION; TEAMS; STYLE;
D O I
10.1080/08853134.2019.1578660
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Peers are important sources of influence in the workplace. In addition to a voluminous literature in management, economics, and education on peer effects, a number of sales researchers have documented the effect of peers on salespeople's attitudes, behaviors, and performance using different research designs, from surveys to observational studies. Despite the importance of peers, some scholars have raised issues with the way peer effects are measured, indicating that some of the documented effects might be spurious or artifacts of the underlying statistical models. In this article, the authors first review the current literature on peer effects in sales. Then, drawing on current critiques on the measurement of peer effects, they classify different measurement challenges that researchers face in identifying these effects. Finally, the authors build on different solutions that some researchers have applied to circumvent these issues to provide a list of potential remedies for both observational and survey research designs.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 274
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Intrafunctional Competitive Intelligence and Sales Performance: A Social Network Perspective [J].
Ahearne, Michael ;
Lam, Son K. ;
Hayati, Babak ;
Kraus, Florian .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2013, 77 (05) :37-56
[2]   The perils of peer effects [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. .
LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2014, 30 :98-108
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN M ASS PUBL POL A
[4]  
[Anonymous], HIGH TURNOVER RATE L
[5]  
[Anonymous], WHY INDIVIDUALS NO L
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SOC DYN
[7]  
[Anonymous], HDB BUSINESS BUSI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 832 YAL EC GROWTH CT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROPENSITY SCORE ANA
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR