The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients

被引:8
|
作者
Matharu, G. S. [1 ]
Janardhan, S. [1 ]
Brash, L. [1 ]
Pynsent, P. B. [1 ]
Dunlop, D. J. [1 ]
James, S. L. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Bristol Rd S, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
关键词
Adverse reaction to metal debris; follow-up; hip arthroplasty; metal-on-metal; ultrasound; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; OXFORD HIP; PSEUDOTUMORS; REPLACEMENTS; RESURFACINGS; REVISION; FAILURE; BEARINGS; MRI;
D O I
10.1308/rcsann.2016.0052
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION We assessed changes in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) after repeat ultrasound examination. METHODS This retrospective, single-centre cohort study involved all patients undergoing two ultrasound examinations of the same MoMHA. Between 2010 and 2014, 96 ultrasound examinations were performed in 48 MoMHAs (mean time between scans = 1.1 years). A radiologist assigned each scan to one of four grades and measured volumes of any solid/cystic masses. Changes in grade and lesion volume between scans were analysed. RESULTS Change in grade between scans was significant (p=0.012); 27% (n=13) of MoMHAs increased in grade, 67% (n=32) had no grade change, and 6% (n=3) decreased in grade. The mean increase in lesion volume was 24.2cm(3) by the second scan, and was significant (p=0.023). Evidence of progression in findings was observed in 54% (26/48) of MoMHAs. Of patients with normal scans initially, 44% (8/18) developed abnormalities. No factors (including blood metal ion concentrations and cup position) were associated significantly with progression of ultrasound findings. CONCLUSIONS Repeat ultrasound in MoMHA patients demonstrated that findings frequently progress in the short-term. Therefore, regular surveillance of MoMHA patients is important, with ultrasound representing an effective investigation for identifying the development and progression of lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Serum Metal Ion Levels in Cementless Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Long-Term Follow-Up Trends
    Kim, Chul-Ho
    Ryu, Jae Jung
    Jeong, Mi Yeon
    Kim, Ji Wan
    Chang, Jae Suk
    Yoon, Pil Whan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (03) : 534 - 537
  • [42] Comparison of Synovial Fluid, Urine, and Serum Ion Levels in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Minimum Follow-Up of 18 Years
    Lass, Richard
    Gruebl, Alexander
    Kolb, Alexander
    Stelzeneder, David
    Pilger, Alexander
    Kubista, Bernd
    Giurea, Alexander
    Windhager, Reinhard
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (09) : 1234 - 1240
  • [43] How much does a medical and healthcare products regulatory agency medical device alert for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients really cost?
    Nandra, Rajpal S.
    Ahmed, Usman
    Berryman, Fiona
    Brash, Lesley
    Dunlop, David J.
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 493 - 500
  • [44] High Rate of Infection After Aseptic Revision of Failed Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Wyles, Cody C.
    Van Demark, Robert E., III
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (02) : 509 - 516
  • [45] Current Concepts in Hip Arthroplasty Imaging: Metal-on-Metal Prostheses, Their Complications, and Imaging Strategies
    Bestic, Joseph M.
    Berquist, Thomas H.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 48 (02) : 178 - 186
  • [46] Sensitivity and specificity for detecting pseudotumors in patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty, metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty-MRI versus ultrasonography performed by an orthopedic surgery resident
    Mikkelsen, Rasmus T.
    Schou, Martin
    Torfing, Trine
    Graumann, Ole
    Overgaard, Soren
    Varnum, Claus
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [47] "Asymptomatic" Pseudotumors After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Ostlere, Simon J.
    McLardy-Smith, Peter
    Athanasou, Nicholas A.
    Gill, Harinderjit S.
    Murray, David W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (04) : 511 - 518
  • [48] Outcomes After Revision of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Gross, Thomas P.
    Liu, Fei
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (09) : 219 - 223
  • [49] Favourable clinical outcomes following cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 10years
    Yu, Weiguang
    Chen, Meiji
    Zeng, Xianshang
    Zhao, Mingdong
    Zhang, Xinchao
    Ye, Junxing
    Zhuang, Jintao
    Han, Guowei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [50] Limited need for screening of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients beyond 10 years of follow-up
    van der Weegen, Walter
    Hoekstra, Henk
    Brakel, Koen
    Sijbesma, Thea
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (01) : 106 - 112