The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients

被引:8
|
作者
Matharu, G. S. [1 ]
Janardhan, S. [1 ]
Brash, L. [1 ]
Pynsent, P. B. [1 ]
Dunlop, D. J. [1 ]
James, S. L. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Bristol Rd S, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
关键词
Adverse reaction to metal debris; follow-up; hip arthroplasty; metal-on-metal; ultrasound; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; OXFORD HIP; PSEUDOTUMORS; REPLACEMENTS; RESURFACINGS; REVISION; FAILURE; BEARINGS; MRI;
D O I
10.1308/rcsann.2016.0052
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION We assessed changes in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) after repeat ultrasound examination. METHODS This retrospective, single-centre cohort study involved all patients undergoing two ultrasound examinations of the same MoMHA. Between 2010 and 2014, 96 ultrasound examinations were performed in 48 MoMHAs (mean time between scans = 1.1 years). A radiologist assigned each scan to one of four grades and measured volumes of any solid/cystic masses. Changes in grade and lesion volume between scans were analysed. RESULTS Change in grade between scans was significant (p=0.012); 27% (n=13) of MoMHAs increased in grade, 67% (n=32) had no grade change, and 6% (n=3) decreased in grade. The mean increase in lesion volume was 24.2cm(3) by the second scan, and was significant (p=0.023). Evidence of progression in findings was observed in 54% (26/48) of MoMHAs. Of patients with normal scans initially, 44% (8/18) developed abnormalities. No factors (including blood metal ion concentrations and cup position) were associated significantly with progression of ultrasound findings. CONCLUSIONS Repeat ultrasound in MoMHA patients demonstrated that findings frequently progress in the short-term. Therefore, regular surveillance of MoMHA patients is important, with ultrasound representing an effective investigation for identifying the development and progression of lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients Is Currently Not Evidence Based or Cost Effective
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Mellon, Stephen J.
    Murray, David W.
    Pandit, Hemant G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (08) : 1317 - 1323
  • [2] Is Ultrasound As Useful As Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Longitudinal Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
    Li, Guoan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (08) : 1821 - 1827
  • [3] How Should We Follow-Up Asymptomatic Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Patients? A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study
    Low, Adrian K.
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Ostlere, Simon J.
    Murray, David W.
    Pandit, Hemant G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (01) : 146 - 151
  • [4] Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Miettinen, S. S. A.
    Makinen, T. J.
    Makela, K.
    Huhtala, H.
    Kettunen, J. S.
    Remes, V.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 107 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [5] The value of serial metal ion levels in following up patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty
    McHugh, Gavin
    Merchant, Rajiv
    Kelly, Gabrielle E.
    Bergin, Karen M.
    McCoy, Gerald F.
    Wozniak, Andrew P.
    Quinlan, John F.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [6] Poor Patient Follow-up After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Costales, Timothy G.
    Greenwell, Patrick H.
    Shield, William, III
    Chapman, Danielle M.
    Griffin, William L.
    Dalury, David F.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (04) : E196 - +
  • [7] Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at Five to Twelve Years Follow-Up: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report
    Greiner, Justin J.
    Callaghan, John J.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Liu, Steve S.
    Goetz, Devon D.
    Mahoney, Craig R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (08) : 1773 - 1778
  • [8] The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying bilateral metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty patients at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Berryman, Fiona
    Brash, Lesley
    Pynsent, Paul B.
    Treacy, Ronan B. C.
    Dunlop, David J.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2018, 84 (02): : 154 - 162
  • [9] The Utility of Metal Ion Trends in Predicting Revision in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Carlson, Bayard C.
    Bryan, Andrew J.
    Carrillo-Villamizar, Nazly T.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09) : S214 - S219
  • [10] Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Judge, Andrew
    Pandit, Hemant G.
    Murray, David W.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 360 : 12 - 16