Three-dimensional analysis of endosseous palatal implants and bones after vertical, horizontal, and diagonal force application

被引:27
作者
Gedrange, T
Bourauel, C
Köbel, C
Harzer, W
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Orthodont, D-8027 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Orthodont, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/25.2.109
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The effects of bite and orthodontic forces exerted on endosseous palatal implants are not completely understood. This applies especially to the biomechanical properties inherent in the different implant geometries and resulting bone remodelling reactions on the one hand, and to the influence on the direction and magnitude of the applied forces on the other. The results of this study should help in the selection of implants for clinical use. Three types of endosseous implants (all 9 mm in length and 3.3 mm in diameter, made of titanium) were used for this investigation. Type 1 was a simple, cylinder-shaped implant; type 2 a cylinder-shaped implant with a superperiosteal step; and type 3 a cylinder-shaped implant, subperiosteally threaded, with a superperiosteal step. The load on the implant was investigated under three conditions of bite and orthodontic forces from 0.01 to 100 N (vertically, horizontally, and diagonally). The study results were calculated by means of a finite element (FE) method. Vertical loading caused bone deformation of more than 600 peps at the simple implant. The largest deformations at this load were found in the trabecular bone with all three implant geometries. However, trabecular bone deformation was reduced by a superperiosteal step. Horizontal loading of the implants shifted the deformation from the trabecular to the cortical bone. Furthermore, a large deformation was measured at the transition from cortical to trabecular bone. The smallest deformations (less than 300 peps) were found for implants with a superperiosteal step and diagonal loading (type 2). The use of threads provided no improvement in loading capacity. All implant types investigated showed good biomechanical properties. However, endosseous implants with a superperiosteal step had the best biomechanical properties under low loads. Thus, the trend should be to optimize the design of implants by producing small implants with additional anchorage on the bone surface.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 115
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INF ORTHOD KIEFEROR
[2]  
Bathe K.J.:., 1986, FINITE ELEMENTE METH
[3]   A NEW DEVICE FOR ABSOLUTE ANCHORAGE FOR ORTHODONTICS [J].
BLOCK, MS ;
HOFFMAN, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (03) :251-258
[4]   3-DIMENSIONAL STRESS-DISTRIBUTION AROUND A DENTAL IMPLANT AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF INTERFACE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BORCHERS, L ;
REICHART, P .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (02) :155-159
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT ELASTIC-MODULUS ON THE STRESS-DISTRIBUTION AROUND LTI CARBON AND ALUMINUM-OXIDE DENTAL IMPLANTS [J].
COOK, SD ;
KLAWITTER, JJ ;
WEINSTEIN, AM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1981, 15 (06) :879-887
[6]  
Donath K, 1992, J Dent Assoc S Afr, V47, P204
[7]  
FROST HM, 1994, ANGLE ORTHOD, V64, P175
[8]   Hard palate deformation in an animal model following quasi-static loading to stimulate that of orthodontic anchorage implants [J].
Gedrange, T ;
Köbel, C ;
Harzer, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2001, 23 (04) :349-354
[9]  
Holmes D C, 1992, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V7, P450
[10]   A SURVEY OF FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS IN ORTHOPEDIC BIOMECHANICS - THE 1ST DECADE [J].
HUISKES, R ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1983, 16 (06) :385-&