A retrospective single-centre analysis of the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in liver transplantation: every nodule matters

被引:18
作者
Centonze, Leonardo [1 ]
Di Sandro, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Lauterio, Andrea [1 ]
De Carlis, Riccardo [1 ]
Sgrazzutti, Cristiano [3 ]
Ciulli, Cristina [1 ,4 ]
Vella, Ivan [1 ]
Vicentin, Ilaria [3 ]
Incarbone, Niccolo [1 ,4 ]
Bagnardi, Vincenzo [5 ]
Vanzulli, Angelo [3 ,6 ]
De Carlis, Luciano [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Dept Gen Surg & Transplantat, Piazza Osped Maggiore 3, I-20162 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg & Liver Transplantat, Modena, Italy
[3] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Adv Technol Dept, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Stat & Quantitat Methods, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; LI-RADS; liver imaging; liver transplantation; Metroticket; 2; 0; tumour staging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; CRITERIA; DIAGNOSIS; IMPROVES; MRECIST; DEATH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/tri.13983
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although the diagnostic value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) protocol is well recognized in clinical practice, its role in liver transplant (LT) setting is under-explored. We sought to evaluate the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in a single-centre retrospective cohort of transplanted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, exploring which LI-RADS subclasses need to be considered in order to grant the best Metroticket 2.0 performance. The most recent pre-LT imaging of 245 patients undergoing LT for HCC between 2005 and 2015 was retrospectively and blindly reviewed, classifying all nodules according to LI-RADS protocol. Metroticket 2.0 accuracy was subsequently tested incorporating all vital nodules identified during multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings attended before LI-RADS reclassification of the latest pre-LT imaging, LR-5 and LR-treatment-viable (LR-TR-V), LR-4/5 and LR-TR-V, and LR-3/4/5 and LR-TR-V nodules respectively. Considering their extremely low probability for harbouring HCC, LR-1 and LR-2 nodules were not considered in this analysis. Incorporation of all HCCs identified during MDT meetings attended before LI-RADS reclassification of the latest pre-LT imaging resulted in a Metroticket 2.0 c-index of 0.72, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.80]. Metroticket 2.0 c-index dropped to 0.60 [95% CI: 0.48-0.72] when LI-RADS-5 and LI-RADS-TR-V (P = 0.0089) or LI-RADS-5, LI-RADS-4 and LI-RADS-TR-V (P = 0.0068) nodules were entered in the calculator. Conversely, addition of LI-RADS-3 HCCs raised the Metroticket 2.0 c-index to 0.65 [95% CI: 0.54-0.86], resulting in a not statistically significant diversion from the original performance (0.72 vs. 0.65; P = 0.08). Exclusion of LR-3 and LR-4 nodules from Metroticket 2.0 calculator resulted in a significant drop in its accuracy. Every nodule with an intermediate-to-high probability of harbouring HCC according to LI-RADS protocol seems to contribute to tumour burden and should be entered in the Metroticket 2.0 calculator in order to grant appropriate performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1712 / 1721
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 [J].
Akinyemiju, Tomi ;
Abera, Semaw ;
Ahmed, Muktar ;
Alam, Noore ;
Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa ;
Allen, Christine ;
Al-Raddadi, Rajaa ;
Alvis-Guzman, Nelson ;
Amoako, Yaw ;
Artaman, Al ;
Ayele, Tadesse Awoke ;
Barac, Aleksandra ;
Bensenor, Isabela ;
Berhane, Adugnaw ;
Bhutta, Zulfiqar ;
Castillo-Rivas, Jacqueline ;
Chitheer, Abdulaal ;
Choi, Jee-Young ;
Cowie, Benjamin ;
Dandona, Lalit ;
Dandona, Rakhi ;
Dey, Subhojit ;
Dicker, Daniel ;
Phuc, Huyen ;
Ekwueme, Donatus U. ;
Zaki, Maysaa El Sayed ;
Fischer, Florian ;
Furst, Thomas ;
Hancock, Jamie ;
Hay, Simon I. ;
Hotez, Peter ;
Jee, Sun Ha ;
Kasaeian, Amir ;
Khader, Yousef ;
Khang, Young-Ho ;
Kumar, G. Anil ;
Kutz, Michael ;
Larson, Heidi ;
Lopez, Alan ;
Lunevicius, Raimundas ;
Malekzadeh, Reza ;
McAlinden, Colm ;
Meier, Toni ;
Mendoza, Walter ;
Mokdad, Ali ;
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar ;
Nagel, Gabriele ;
Nguyen, Quyen ;
Nguyen, Grant ;
Ogbo, Felix .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (12) :1683-1691
[2]   Surgical Resection vs. Percutaneous Ablation for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Exploring the Impact of Li-RADS Classification on Oncological Outcomes [J].
Centonze, Leonardo ;
Di Sandro, Stefano ;
Lauterio, Andrea ;
De Carlis, Riccardo ;
Frassoni, Samuele ;
Rampoldi, Antonio ;
Tuscano, Bruno ;
Bagnardi, Vincenzo ;
Vanzulli, Angelo ;
De Carlis, Luciano .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (07)
[3]   Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients [J].
Chernyak, Victoria ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. ;
Kamaya, Aya ;
Kielar, Ania Z. ;
Elsayes, Khaled M. ;
Bashir, Mustafa R. ;
Kono, Yuko ;
Do, Richard K. ;
Mitchell, Donald G. ;
Singal, Amit G. ;
Tang, An ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) :816-830
[4]   Including mRECIST in the Metroticket 2.0 criteria improves prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma-related death after liver transplant [J].
Cucchetti, Alessandro ;
Serenari, Matteo ;
Sposito, Carlo ;
Di Sandro, Stefano ;
Mosconi, Cristina ;
Vicentin, Ilaria ;
Garanzini, Enrico ;
Mazzaferro, Vincenzo ;
De Carlis, Luciano ;
Golfieri, Rita ;
Spreafico, Carlo ;
Vanzulli, Angelo ;
Buscemi, Vincenzo ;
Ravaioli, Matteo ;
Ercolani, Giorgio ;
Pinna, Antonio Daniele ;
Cescon, Matteo .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) :342-348
[5]   LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies [J].
Cunha, Guilherme M. ;
Tamayo-Murillo, Dorathy E. ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (01) :29-42
[6]   Liver-allocation policies for patients affected by HCC in Europe [J].
De Carlis L. ;
Di Sandro S. ;
Centonze L. ;
Lauterio A. ;
Buscemi V. ;
De Carlis R. ;
Ferla F. ;
Sguinzi R. ;
Okolicsanyi S. ;
Belli L. ;
Strazzabosco M. .
Current Transplantation Reports, 2016, 3 (4) :313-318
[7]   From a Philosophical Framework to a Valid Prognostic Staging System of the New "Comprehensive Assessment" for Transplantable Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Di Sandro, Stefano ;
Bagnardi, Vincenzo ;
Cucchetti, Alessandro ;
Lauterio, Andrea ;
De Carlis, Riccardo ;
Benuzzi, Laura ;
Danieli, Maria ;
Botta, Francesca ;
Centonze, Leonardo ;
Najjar, Marc ;
De Carlis, Luciano .
CANCERS, 2019, 11 (06)
[8]   Liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma should be expanded - A 22-year experience with 467 patients at UCLA [J].
Duffy, John P. ;
Vardanian, Andrew ;
Benjamin, Elizabeth ;
Watson, Melissa ;
Farmer, Douglas G. ;
Ghobrial, Rafik M. ;
Lipshutz, Gerald ;
Yersiz, Hasan ;
Lu, David S. K. ;
Lassman, Charles ;
Tong, Myron J. ;
Hiatt, Jonathan R. ;
Busuttil, Ronald W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (03) :502-511
[9]   Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Model Including α-Fetoprotein Improves the Performance of Milan Criteria [J].
Duvoux, Christophe ;
Roudot-Thoraval, Francoise ;
Decaens, Thomas ;
Pessione, Fabienne ;
Badran, Hanaa ;
Piardi, Tullio ;
Francoz, Claire ;
Compagnon, Philippe ;
Vanlemmens, Claire ;
Dumortier, Jerome ;
Dharancy, Sebastien ;
Gugenheim, Jean ;
Bernard, Pierre-Henri ;
Adam, Rene ;
Radenne, Sylvie ;
Muscari, Fabrice ;
Conti, Filomena ;
Hardwigsen, Jean ;
Pageaux, Georges-Philippe ;
Chazouilleres, Olivier ;
Salame, Ephrem ;
Hilleret, Marie-Noelle ;
Lebray, Pascal ;
Abergel, Armand ;
Debette-Gratien, Marilyne ;
Kluger, Michael D. ;
Mallat, Ariane ;
Azoulay, Daniel ;
Cherqui, Daniel .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 143 (04) :986-+
[10]  
European Assoc Study Liver, 2018, J HEPATOL, V69, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019