Factors Associated With the Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine: Cross-sectional National Study

被引:10
作者
Kasting, Monica L. [1 ,2 ]
Macy, Jonathan T. [3 ]
Grannis, Shaun J. [4 ,5 ]
Wiensch, Ashley J. [5 ]
Ferres, Juan M. Lavista [6 ]
Dixon, Brian E. [5 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, W Lafayette, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Canc Prevent & Control Program, Simon Comprehens Canc Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Appl Hlth Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Ctr Biomed Informat, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Microsoft Corp, AI Good Res Lab, Redmond, WA USA
[7] Indiana Univ, Richard M Fairbanks Sch Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[8] Vet Hlth Adm, Ctr Hlth Informat & Commun, Richard L Roudebush VA Med Ctr, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv, Indianapolis, IN USA
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2022年 / 8卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; vaccines; vaccination intention; vaccine hesitancy; Health Belief Model; reasoned action approach; vaccination; public health; online survey; health intervention; logistic regression; demographic; REASONED ACTION APPROACH; HPV VACCINATION; HEALTH; INTERVENTION; COVERAGE; BELIEFS; URBAN;
D O I
10.2196/37203
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health crisis, and vaccines are the most effective means of preventing severe consequences of this disease. Hesitancy regarding vaccines persists among adults in the United States, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of safety and efficacy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to use the Health Belief Model (HBM) and reasoned action approach (RAA) to examine COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by comparing those who had already received 1 vaccine to those who had received none. Methods: This study examined demographic and theory-based factors associated with vaccine uptake and intention among 1643 adults in the United States who completed an online survey during February and March 2021. Survey items included demographic variables (eg, age, sex, political ideology), attitudes, and health belief variables (eg, perceived self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility). Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used for vaccine uptake/intent. The first model included demographic variables. The second model added theory-based factors to examine the association of health beliefs and vaccine uptake above and beyond the associations explained by demographic characteristics alone. Results: The majority of participants were male (n=974, 59.3%), White (n=1347, 82.0%), and non-Hispanic (n=1518, 92.4%) and reported they had already received a COVID-19 vaccine or definitely would when it was available to them (n=1306, 79.5%). Demographic variables significantly associated with vaccine uptake/intent included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06), other race (AOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.83 vs White), and political ideology (AOR 15.77, 95% CI 7.03-35.35 very liberal vs very conservative). The theory-based factors most strongly associated with uptake/intention were attitudes (AOR 3.72, 95% CI 2.42-5.73), self-efficacy (AOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.34-2.29), and concerns about side effects (AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76). Although race and political ideology were significant in the model of demographic characteristics, they were not significant when controlling for attitudes and beliefs. Conclusions: Vaccination represents one of the best tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other possible pandemics in the future. This study showed that older age, attitudes, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, and self-efficacy are positively associated with vaccine uptake and intent, whereas perceived side effects and lack of trust in the vaccine are associated with lower uptake and intent. Race and political ideology were not significant predictors when attitudes and beliefs were considered.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, QUICK FACTS US
  • [2] SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) : 122 - 147
  • [3] Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, DOI DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • [4] The Influence of Vaccine-critical Websites on Perceiving Vaccination Risks
    Betsch, Cornelia
    Renkewitz, Frank
    Betsch, Tilmann
    Ulshoefer, Corina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 15 (03) : 446 - 455
  • [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), COVID 19 SAF COVID 1
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), COVID 19 OLD AD
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), COVID 19 VACC
  • [8] Coe Antoinette B, 2012, Innov Pharm, V3, P1
  • [9] Capturing COVID-19-Like Symptoms at Scale Using Banner Ads on an Online News Platform: Pilot Survey Study
    Dixon, Brian E.
    Mukherjee, Sumit
    Wiensch, Ashley
    Gray, Mary L.
    Ferres, Juan M. Lavista
    Grannis, Shaun J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [10] Health Belief Model applied to non-compliance with HPV vaccine among female university students
    Donadiki, E. M.
    Jimenez-Garcia, R.
    Hernandez-Barrera, V.
    Sourtzi, P.
    Carrasco-Garrido, P.
    Lopez de Andres, A.
    Jimenez-Trujillo, I.
    Velonakis, E. G.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 128 (03) : 268 - 273