Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization

被引:68
作者
Borrero, Sonya
Schwarz, Eleanor B.
Reeves, Matthew F.
Bost, James E.
Creinin, Mitchell D.
Ibrahim, Said A. [1 ]
机构
[1] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equity Res & Promot 151C, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Magee Womens Res Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Inst Clin Res Educ, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equity & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION; FEMALE STERILIZATION; WOMEN; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000249604.78234.d3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent effects of race or ethnicity and insurance status on use of tubal sterilization rates. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional data collected by the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. The survey is designed to represent women and men aged 15-44 years in the household population of the United States. Our main outcome measure was tubal sterilization at any time before interview. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the effects of race or ethnicity and insurance status on rates of tubal sterilization after adjusting for important confounders. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 7,643 women: 66% were white, 15% were Hispanic, and 14% were African American; 68% had private insurance and 32% had public or no insurance. After adjusting for age, insurance status, parity, income, education, marital status, and religion, African-American women were more likely than white women to undergo tubal sterilization (adjusted odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.88). After adjusting for age, race or ethnicity, parity, income, education, marital status, and religion, women with public or no insurance were more likely to undergo sterilization compared with women with private insurance (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.74). CONCLUSION: African-American women and women with no or public insurance were more likely to have undergone! tubal sterilization compared with white women and women with private insurance, respectively. Additional research to identify factors that influence women's decision to undergo sterilization is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 100
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Racial disparities in reproductive health outcomes
    Anachebe, NF
    Sutton, MY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (04) : S37 - S42
  • [2] Evaluating contraceptive choice through the method-mix approach -: An Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Task Force Study
    Baveja, R
    Buckshee, K
    Das, K
    Das, SK
    Hazra, MN
    Gopalan, S
    Goswami, A
    Kodkany, BS
    Kumari, CNS
    Zaveri, K
    Roy, M
    Datey, S
    Gaur, LN
    Gupta, NK
    Gupta, RN
    Saxena, NC
    Singh, R
    Kumar, S
    Yadav, SC
    Saxena, BN
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2000, 61 (02) : 113 - 119
  • [3] Context of care and contraceptive method use
    Boardman, LA
    Weitzen, S
    Lapane, KL
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2004, 14 (02) : 51 - 59
  • [4] Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization
    Bumpass, LL
    Thomson, E
    Godecker, AL
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) : 937 - 946
  • [5] CHANDRA A, 1998, SERIES NATL CTR HLTH, V23
  • [6] ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DIAPHRAGM AMONG LOW-INCOME WOMEN IN SAO-PAULO, BRAZIL
    DOLAGO, TD
    BARBOSA, RM
    KALCKMANN, S
    VILLELA, WV
    GOHIMAN, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 21 (03): : 114 - 118
  • [7] ELIOT JW, 1973, FAM PLANN PERSPECT, V5, P132
  • [8] Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States
    Godecker, AL
    Thomson, E
    Bumpass, LL
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 33 (01): : 35 - +
  • [9] HARRISON DD, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P565
  • [10] Unintended pregnancy in the United States
    Henshaw, SK
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (01): : 24 - +