Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged >= 60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness

被引:22
作者
Cornely, Oliver A. [1 ]
Watt, Maureen [2 ,6 ]
McCrea, Charles [3 ]
Goldenberg, Simon D. [4 ,5 ]
De Nigris, Enrico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne Excellence Cluster Cellular Stress Respon, ZKS Koln, Clin Trials Ctr Cologne,Dept Internal Med 1, D-50924 Cologne, Germany
[2] Astellas Pharma Inc, Chertsey, England
[3] PAREXEL Access Consulting, London, England
[4] St Thomas Hosp, Kings Coll London, Ctr Clin Infect & Diagnost Res, London, England
[5] St Thomas Hosp, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[6] Shire Pharmaceut, CH-6300 Zug, Switzerland
关键词
LENGTH-OF-STAY; MORTALITY; OLDER;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dky184
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients >= 60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (1356 pound versus 260 pound/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; 10 pound 815 versus 11459 pound/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (694 pound versus 1199 pound/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost 53 pound less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 30 pound 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2529 / 2539
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection [J].
Burton, Hannah E. ;
Mitchell, Stephen A. ;
Watt, Maureen .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 (11) :1123-1140
[12]   Evolving Insights Into the Epidemiology and Control of Clostridium difficile in Hospitals [J].
Caroff, Daniel A. ;
Yokoe, Deborah S. ;
Klompas, Michael .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (07) :1232-1238
[13]   Efficacy of alternative fidaxomicin dosing regimens for treatment of simulated Clostridium difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model [J].
Chilton, C. H. ;
Crowther, G. S. ;
Todhunter, S. L. ;
Ashwin, H. ;
Longshaw, C. M. ;
Karas, A. ;
Wilcox, M. H. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (09) :2598-2607
[14]   Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial [J].
Cornely, Oliver A. ;
Crook, Derrick W. ;
Esposito, Roberto ;
Poirier, Andre ;
Somero, Michael S. ;
Weiss, Karl ;
Sears, Pamela ;
Gorbach, Sherwood .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12 (04) :281-289
[15]  
Curtis L., 2015, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care
[16]   European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection [J].
Debast, S. B. ;
Bauer, M. P. ;
Kuijper, E. J. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 20 :1-26
[17]   Attributable Inpatient Costs of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infections [J].
Dubberke, Erik R. ;
Schaefer, Eric ;
Reske, Kimberly A. ;
Zilberberg, Marya ;
Hollenbeak, Christopher S. ;
Olsen, Margaret A. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (11) :1400-1407
[18]   Increased hospital length of stay attributable to Clostridium difficile infection in patients with four co-morbidities: an analysis of hospital episode statistics in four European countries [J].
Eckmann, Christian ;
Wasserman, Matthew ;
Latif, Faisal ;
Roberts, Graeme ;
Beriot-Mathiot, Axelle .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 14 (05) :835-846
[19]   Clinical and Economic Benefits of Fidaxomicin Compared to Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection [J].
Gallagher, Jason C. ;
Reilly, Joseph P. ;
Navalkele, Bhagyashri ;
Downham, Gemma ;
Haynes, Kevin ;
Trivedi, Manish .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (11) :7007-7010
[20]  
Guery B, 2018, LANCET INFECT DIS, V18, P296, DOI [10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30751-X, 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30751-x]