Evolutionary Psychology Controversies, Questions, Prospects, and Limitations

被引:199
作者
Confer, Jaime C. [1 ]
Easton, Judith A. [1 ]
Fleischman, Diana S. [1 ]
Goetz, Cari D. [1 ]
Lewis, David M. G. [1 ]
Perilloux, Carin [1 ]
Buss, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
evolutionary psychology; misconceptions; adaptation; psychological mechanisms; natural selection; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ADAPTIVE MEMORY; EMPIRICAL-TEST; CULTURE; HYPOTHESIS; JEALOUSY; MEN; PERSONALITY; SOCIOSEXUALITY; UNIVERSALITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0018413
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evolutionary psychology has emerged over the past 15 years as a major theoretical perspective, generating an increasing volume of empirical studies and assuming a larger presence within psychological science. At the same time, it has generated critiques and remains controversial among some psychologists. Some of the controversy stems from hypotheses that go against traditional psychological theories; some from empirical findings that may have disturbing implications; some from misunderstandings about the logic of evolutionary psychology; and some from reasonable scientific concerns about its underlying framework. This article identifies some of the most common concerns and attempts to elucidate evolutionary psychology's stance pertaining to them. These include issues of testability and falsfiability; the domain specificity versus domain generality of psychological mechanisms; the role of novel environments as they interact with evolved psychological circuits; the role of genes in the conceptual structure of evolutionary psychology; the roles of learning, socialization, and culture in evolutionary psychology; and the practical value of applied evolutionary psychology. The article concludes with a discussion of the limitations of current evolutionary psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 126
页数:17
相关论文
共 149 条
  • [51] Dopamine receptor genetic polymorphisms and body composition in undernourished pastoralists: An exploration of nutrition indices among nomadic and recently settled Ariaal men of northern Kenya
    Eisenberg, Dan T. A.
    Campbell, Benjamin
    Gray, Peter B.
    Sorenson, Michael D.
    [J]. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [52] Ellis B.J., 2005, ORIGINS SOCIAL MIND
  • [53] The stress response systems: Universality and adaptive individual differences
    Ellis, Bruce J.
    Jackson, Jenee James
    Boyce, W. Thomas
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2006, 26 (02) : 175 - 212
  • [54] Culture and the evolution of social learning
    Flinn, MV
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1997, 18 (01) : 23 - 67
  • [55] The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis
    Fraley, RC
    Brumbaugh, CC
    Marks, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 89 (05) : 731 - 746
  • [56] Evolutionary psychology versus fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypothesis
    Frankenhuis, Willem E.
    Ploeger, Annemie
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 20 (06) : 687 - 710
  • [57] Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences
    Gangestad, Steven W.
    Haselton, Martie G.
    Buss, David M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2006, 17 (02) : 75 - 95
  • [58] PATHOGEN PREVALENCE AND HUMAN MATE PREFERENCES
    GANGESTAD, SW
    BUSS, DM
    [J]. ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1993, 14 (02): : 89 - 96
  • [59] Evolution of Human Parental Behavior and the Human Family
    Geary, David C.
    Flinn, Mark V.
    [J]. PARENTING-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2001, 1 (1-2): : 5 - 61
  • [60] Geary DC, 2009, FOUNDATIONS IN EVOLUTIONARY COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, P22, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511626586.002