Evolutionary Psychology Controversies, Questions, Prospects, and Limitations

被引:199
作者
Confer, Jaime C. [1 ]
Easton, Judith A. [1 ]
Fleischman, Diana S. [1 ]
Goetz, Cari D. [1 ]
Lewis, David M. G. [1 ]
Perilloux, Carin [1 ]
Buss, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
evolutionary psychology; misconceptions; adaptation; psychological mechanisms; natural selection; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ADAPTIVE MEMORY; EMPIRICAL-TEST; CULTURE; HYPOTHESIS; JEALOUSY; MEN; PERSONALITY; SOCIOSEXUALITY; UNIVERSALITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0018413
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evolutionary psychology has emerged over the past 15 years as a major theoretical perspective, generating an increasing volume of empirical studies and assuming a larger presence within psychological science. At the same time, it has generated critiques and remains controversial among some psychologists. Some of the controversy stems from hypotheses that go against traditional psychological theories; some from empirical findings that may have disturbing implications; some from misunderstandings about the logic of evolutionary psychology; and some from reasonable scientific concerns about its underlying framework. This article identifies some of the most common concerns and attempts to elucidate evolutionary psychology's stance pertaining to them. These include issues of testability and falsfiability; the domain specificity versus domain generality of psychological mechanisms; the role of novel environments as they interact with evolved psychological circuits; the role of genes in the conceptual structure of evolutionary psychology; the roles of learning, socialization, and culture in evolutionary psychology; and the practical value of applied evolutionary psychology. The article concludes with a discussion of the limitations of current evolutionary psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 126
页数:17
相关论文
共 149 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], HDB EVOLUTIONARY PSY
  • [12] Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate
    Barrett, H. Clark
    Kurzban, Robert
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (03) : 628 - 647
  • [13] Belsky J., 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, P237, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198568308.013.0018
  • [14] Bingham PM, 2000, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V9, P248, DOI 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:6<248::AID-EVAN1003>3.3.CO
  • [15] 2-O
  • [16] Child development and evolutionary psychology
    Bjorklund, DF
    Pellegrini, AD
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 71 (06) : 1687 - 1708
  • [17] Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection?
    Bobrow, D
    Bailey, JM
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 (05) : 361 - 368
  • [18] Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: Adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum
    Bracha, HS
    [J]. CNS SPECTRUMS, 2004, 9 (09) : 679 - 685
  • [19] Brown RM, 1999, SUICIDE LIFE-THREAT, V29, P58
  • [20] Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone
    Burnham, TC
    Chapman, JF
    Gray, PB
    McIntyre, MH
    Lipson, SF
    Ellison, PT
    [J]. HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 44 (02) : 119 - 122