Evolutionary Psychology Controversies, Questions, Prospects, and Limitations

被引:199
作者
Confer, Jaime C. [1 ]
Easton, Judith A. [1 ]
Fleischman, Diana S. [1 ]
Goetz, Cari D. [1 ]
Lewis, David M. G. [1 ]
Perilloux, Carin [1 ]
Buss, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
evolutionary psychology; misconceptions; adaptation; psychological mechanisms; natural selection; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ADAPTIVE MEMORY; EMPIRICAL-TEST; CULTURE; HYPOTHESIS; JEALOUSY; MEN; PERSONALITY; SOCIOSEXUALITY; UNIVERSALITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0018413
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evolutionary psychology has emerged over the past 15 years as a major theoretical perspective, generating an increasing volume of empirical studies and assuming a larger presence within psychological science. At the same time, it has generated critiques and remains controversial among some psychologists. Some of the controversy stems from hypotheses that go against traditional psychological theories; some from empirical findings that may have disturbing implications; some from misunderstandings about the logic of evolutionary psychology; and some from reasonable scientific concerns about its underlying framework. This article identifies some of the most common concerns and attempts to elucidate evolutionary psychology's stance pertaining to them. These include issues of testability and falsfiability; the domain specificity versus domain generality of psychological mechanisms; the role of novel environments as they interact with evolved psychological circuits; the role of genes in the conceptual structure of evolutionary psychology; the roles of learning, socialization, and culture in evolutionary psychology; and the practical value of applied evolutionary psychology. The article concludes with a discussion of the limitations of current evolutionary psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 126
页数:17
相关论文
共 149 条
  • [91] Klein RG, 2000, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V9, P17, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(2000)9:1<17::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO
  • [92] 2-A
  • [93] Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization
    Kurzban, R
    Tooby, J
    Cosmides, L
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (26) : 15387 - 15392
  • [94] A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion
    Lalumiere, ML
    Chalmers, LJ
    Quinsey, VL
    Seto, MC
    [J]. ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1996, 17 (05): : 299 - 318
  • [95] Leakey RichardE., 1992, Origins reconsidered: search of what makes us human
  • [96] Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest
    Lieberman, D
    Tooby, J
    Cosmides, L
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1517) : 819 - 826
  • [97] The architecture of human kin detection
    Lieberman, Debra
    Tooby, John
    Cosmides, Leda
    [J]. NATURE, 2007, 445 (7129) : 727 - 731
  • [98] CROSS-CULTURAL PATTERNS IN THE TRAINING OF CHILDREN - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE
    LOW, BS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 103 (04) : 311 - 319
  • [99] PARENTS DIFFERENTIAL SOCIALIZATION OF BOYS AND GIRLS - A METAANALYSIS
    LYTTON, H
    ROMNEY, DM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (02) : 267 - 296
  • [100] Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement
    McAndrew, Francis T.
    Bell, Emily K.
    Garcia, Contitta Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (07) : 1562 - 1577