The clinical practice guideline palliative care for children and other strategies to enhance shared decision-making in pediatric palliative care; pediatricians' critical reflections

被引:17
作者
Dreesens, Dunja [1 ,2 ]
Veul, Lotte [3 ]
Westermann, Jonne [4 ]
Wijnands, Nicole [5 ]
Kremer, Leontien [6 ,7 ]
van der Weijden, Trudy [1 ]
Verhagen, Eduard [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, Sch CAPHRI, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Knowledge Inst Federat Med Specialists, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] GGD Regio Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] GGzCentraal, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Emma Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Princess Maxima Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[9] Beatrix Childrens Hosp, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Clinical practice guideline; Shared decision-making; Palliative care; Children; Interviews; Qualitative; REPORTING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; APPROPRIATE INITIATION; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; WITHDRAWAL; PARENTS; CONSULTATIONS; PREFERENCES; DIALYSIS; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-019-1849-0
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Because of practice variation and new developments in palliative pediatric care, the Dutch Association of Pediatrics decided to develop the clinical practice guideline (CPG) palliative care for children. With this guideline, the association also wanted to precipitate an attitude shift towards shared decision-making (SDM) and therefore integrated SDM in the CPG Palliative care for children. The aim was to gain insight if integrating SDM in CPGs can potentially encourage pediatricians to practice SDM. Its objectives were to explore pediatricians' attitudes and thoughts regarding (1) recommendations on SDM in CPGs in general and the guideline Palliative care for children specifically; (2) other SDM enhancing strategies or tools linked to CPGs. Methods Semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Pediatricians (15) were recruited through purposive sampling in three university-based pediatric centers in the Netherlands. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, coded by at least two authors and analyzed with NVivo. Results Some pediatricians considered SDM a skill or attitude that cannot be addressed by clinical practice guidelines. According to others, however, clinical practice guidelines could enhance SDM. In case of the guideline Palliative care for children, the recommendations needed to focus more on how to practice SDM, and offer more detailed recommendations, preferring a recommendation stating multiple options. Most interviewed pediatricians felt that patient decisions aids were beneficial to patients, and could ensure that all topics relevant to the patient are covered, even topics the pediatrician might not consider him or herself, or deems less important. Regardless of the perceived benefit, some pediatricians preferred providing the information themselves instead of using a patient decision aid. Conclusions For clinical practice guidelines to potentially enhance SDM, guideline developers should avoid blanket recommendations in the case of preference sensitive choices, and SDM should not be limited to recommendations on non-treatment decisions. Furthermore, preference sensitive recommendations are preferably linked with patient decision aids.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RICHTL RICHTL 20 CRI, P5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HAAG
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]   Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines [J].
Armstrong, Melissa J. ;
Gronseth, Gary S. .
NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 8 (01) :58-61
[5]   Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care [J].
Barry, Michael J. ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) :780-781
[6]   Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care: a qualitative longitudinal observational and interview study [J].
Brom, Linda ;
De Snoo-Trimp, Janine C. ;
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. ;
Widdershoven, Guy A. M. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Pasman, H. Roeline W. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) :69-84
[7]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[8]   Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument [J].
Couet, Nicolas ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Vaillancourt, Hugues ;
Leblanc, Annie ;
Turcotte, Stephane ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Legare, France .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) :542-561
[9]   Shared decision making: everyone wants it, so why isn't it happening? [J].
Coulter, Angela .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 16 (02) :117-118
[10]   Children's participation in shared decision-making: Children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences [J].
Coyne, Imelda ;
Amory, Aislinn ;
Kiernan, Gemma ;
Gibson, Faith .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 (03) :273-280