CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Methylation of Wnt Pathway Genes Together Predict Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

被引:23
|
作者
Kim, Se Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Park, Kyu Hyun [3 ]
Shin, Sang Joon [3 ]
Lee, Kang Young [4 ]
Kim, Tae Il [3 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [4 ]
Rha, Sun Young [3 ]
Ahn, Joong Bae [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Colorectal carcinoma; CpG island methylator phenotype; DNA methylation; Wnt pathway; PROMOTER METHYLATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; MUTATION;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2018.59.5.588
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dysregulation of the Wnt pathway is a crucial step in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to determine whether DNA methylation of Wnt pathway genes helps predict treatment response and survival in patients with meta-static or recurrent CRC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected primary tumor tissues from 194 patients with metastatic or recurrent CRC. Pyrosequencing was used to examine the methylation of 10 CpG island loci in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. To elucidate the predictive role of DNA methylation markers, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and Cox regression were performed for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: The methylation frequencies of the 10 genes analyzed (p16, p19, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, hMLH1, DKK3, WNT5A, AXIN2, and TFAP2E) were 47.9%, 10.8%, 21.1%, 16.0%, 20.6%, 0.5%, 53.1%, 32.0%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively. We divided patients into three groups based on the number of methylated genes (group 1, no methylation n=38; group 2, 1-2 methylations n 2; group 3, 3 or more methylations n=64). Among patients treated with palliative chemotherapy (n=167), median OSs of groups 1, 2, and 3 were 39.1, 39.7, and 29.1 months, respectively (log rank p=0.013). After adjustment, number of methylations was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor (0-2 methylated vs. 1.3 methylated: hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.56, p=0.007). Conclusion: This study suggests that methylation of Wnt pathway genes, in addition to known CpG island methylator phenotype markers, may help predict treatment outcome and survival in patients with CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 594
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The CpG island methylator phenotype in breast cancer is associated with the lobular subtype
    Roessler, Jessica
    Ammerpohl, Ole
    Gutwein, Jana
    Steinemann, Doris
    Schlegelberger, Brigitte
    Weyer, Veronika
    Sariyar, Murat
    Geffers, Robert
    Arnold, Norbert
    Schmutzler, Rita
    Bartram, Claus R.
    Heinrich, Tilman
    Abbas, Mahmoud
    Antonopoulos, Wiebke
    Schipper, Elisa
    Hasemeier, Britta
    Kreipe, Hans
    Lehmann, Ulrich
    EPIGENOMICS, 2015, 7 (02) : 187 - 199
  • [32] CpG island methylator phenotype is an independent predictor of survival after curative resection for colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    Kim, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (08) : 1469 - 1474
  • [33] DNA methylation subgroups and the CpG island methylator phenotype in gastric cancer: a comprehensive profiling approach
    Loh, Marie
    Liem, Natalia
    Vaithilingam, Aparna
    Lim, Pei Li
    Sapari, Nur Sabrina
    Elahi, Eiram
    Mok, Zuan Yu
    Cheng, Chee Leong
    Yan, Benedict
    Pang, Brendan
    Salto-Tellez, Manuel
    Yong, Wei Peng
    Iacopetta, Barry
    Soong, Richie
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [34] Impact on prognosis of the regional distribution of MGMT methylation with respect to the CpG island methylator phenotype and age in glioma patients
    Pilar Mur
    Ángel Rodríguez de Lope
    Francisco Javier Díaz-Crespo
    Teresa Hernández-Iglesias
    Teresa Ribalta
    Concepción Fiaño
    Juan Fernando García
    Juan Antonio Rey
    Manuela Mollejo
    Bárbara Meléndez
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2015, 122 : 441 - 450
  • [35] Low expression of γ-glutamyl hydrolase mRNA in primary colorectal cancer with the CpG island methylator phenotype
    K Kawakami
    A Ooyama
    A Ruszkiewicz
    M Jin
    G Watanabe
    J Moore
    T Oka
    B Iacopetta
    T Minamoto
    British Journal of Cancer, 2008, 98 : 1555 - 1561
  • [36] Tetranucleotide and Low Microsatellite Instability Are Inversely Associated with the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer
    Meessen, Sabine
    Currey, Nicola
    Jahan, Zeenat
    Parker, Hannah W.
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    Buchanan, Daniel D.
    Hopper, John L.
    Segelov, Eva
    Dahlstrom, Jane E.
    Kohonen-Corish, Maija R. J.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [37] Impact on prognosis of the regional distribution of MGMT methylation with respect to the CpG island methylator phenotype and age in glioma patients
    Mur, Pilar
    Rodriguez de Lope, Angel
    Javier Diaz-Crespo, Francisco
    Hernandez-Iglesias, Teresa
    Ribalta, Teresa
    Fiano, Concepcion
    Fernando Garcia, Juan
    Antonio Rey, Juan
    Mollejo, Manuela
    Melendez, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 122 (03) : 441 - 450
  • [38] Prognostic implication of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers depends on tumour location
    Bae, J. M.
    Kim, J. H.
    Cho, N-Y
    Kim, T-Y
    Kang, G. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (04) : 1004 - 1012
  • [39] Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Role of the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer
    Wang, Jing
    Deng, Zhujun
    Lang, Xiaoqiang
    Jiang, Juan
    Xie, Kang
    Lu, Sifen
    Hu, Qiongxia
    Huo, Yuwei
    Xiong, Xinru
    Zhu, Niu
    Zhang, Wengeng
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [40] Cross talk of chromosome instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and mismatch repair in colorectal cancer
    Zhang, Tian-Ming
    Huang, Tao
    Wang, Rong-Fei
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (02) : 1736 - 1746