Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses

被引:30
作者
Aldrich, John H. [1 ]
Montgomery, Jacob M. [2 ]
Sparks, David B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
HOUSE-OF-REPRESENTATIVES; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; IDEAL POINTS; PARTY; US; AGENDA; ISSUES; INFORMATION; COALITIONS; RATIONALE;
D O I
10.1093/pan/mpt048
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this article, we challenge the conclusion that the preferences of members of Congress are best represented as existing in a low-dimensional space. We conduct Monte Carlo simulations altering assumptions regarding the dimensionality and distribution of member preferences and scale the resulting roll call matrices. Our simulations show that party polarization generates misleading evidence in favor of low dimensionality. This suggests that the increasing levels of party polarization in recent Congresses may have produced false evidence in favor of a low-dimensional policy space. However, we show that focusing more narrowly on each party caucus in isolation can help researchers discern the true dimensionality of the policy space in the context of significant party polarization. We re-examine the historical roll call record and find evidence suggesting that the low dimensionality of the contemporary Congress may reflect party polarization rather than changes in the dimensionality of policy conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 456
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution [J].
Adams, GD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 41 (03) :718-737
[2]  
Aldrich John H., 2000, AM J POLIT SCI, V46, P164
[3]  
[Anonymous], 589 U WASH
[4]   Candidate positioning in US house elections [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
Snyder, JM ;
Stewart, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 45 (01) :136-159
[5]   ELECTIONS, COALITIONS, AND LEGISLATIVE OUTCOMES [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D ;
BANKS, J .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1988, 82 (02) :405-422
[6]   Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesiain ideal point estimation [J].
Bafumi, J ;
Gelman, A ;
Park, DK ;
Kaplan, N .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2005, 13 (02) :171-187
[7]   Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress [J].
Bafumi, Joseph ;
Herron, Michael C. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 104 (03) :519-542
[8]  
Bartholomew D, 2011, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119970583
[9]   ON THE RATIONALE OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
Black, Duncan .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (01) :23-34
[10]  
Brady DavidW., 2006, Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush