Regional integrated energy system schemes selection based on risk expectation and Mahalanobis-Taguchi system

被引:4
作者
Yuan, Jiahang [1 ]
Li, Yun [2 ]
Luo, Xinggang [1 ]
Li, Lingfei [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongliang [1 ]
Li, Cunbin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Regional integrated energy system; Mahalanobis-Taguchi system; Mobius transformation coefficients; Bonferroni mean; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY; OPERATORS;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-190211
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Regional integrated energy system (RIES) provides a platform for coupling utilization of multi-energy and makes various energy demand from client possible. The suitable RIES composition scheme will upgrade energy structure and improve integrated energy utilization efficiency. Based on a RIES construction project in Jiangsu province, this paper proposes a new multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for the selection of RIES schemes. Because that subjective evaluation on RIES schemes benefit under criteria has uncertainty and hesitancy, intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number (ITFN) which has the better capability to model ill-known quantities is presented. In consideration of risk attitude and interdependency of criteria, a new decision model with risk coefficients, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and Choquet integral is proposed. Firstly, the decision matrices given by experts are normalized, and then are transformed to minimum expectation matrices according to different risk coefficients. Secondly, the weights of criteria from different experts are calculated by Mahalanobis-Taguchi system. Mobius transformation coefficients based on interaction degree are to calculate 2-order additive fuzzy measures, and then the comprehensive weights of criteria are obtained by fuzzy measures and Choquet integral. Thirdly, based on group decision consensus requirement, the weights of experts are obtained by the maximum entropy and grey correlation. Fourthly, the minimum expectation matrices are aggregated by the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy Bonferroni mean operator. Thus, the ranking result according to the comparison rules using the minimum expectation and the maximum expectation is obtained. Finally, an illustrative example is taken in the present study to make the proposed method comprehensible.
引用
收藏
页码:10333 / 10350
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Sustainability assessment of energy systems: A novel integrated model
    Abu-Rayash, Azzam
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 1098 - 1116
  • [2] INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS
    ATANASSOV, KT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [3] Chang Z., 2015, Chin. J. Manag. Sci., V23, P105
  • [4] [陈柏森 Chen Baisen], 2018, [电力系统自动化, Automation of Electric Power Systems], V42, P174
  • [5] Chen Zhen-song, 2014, Control and Decision, V29, P1053, DOI 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.0305
  • [6] [陈振颂 Chen Zhensong], 2014, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V34, P3138
  • [7] Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru
    Delgado, Alexi
    Romero, I.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 77 : 108 - 121
  • [8] Modeling and design of future multi-energy generation and transmission systems
    Favre-Perrod, Patrick
    Kienzle, Florian
    Andersson, Goeran
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER, 2010, 20 (08): : 994 - 1008
  • [9] Estimation of the failure probability of an integrated energy system based on the first order reliability method
    Fu, Xueqian
    Guo, Qinglai
    Sun, Hongbin
    Zhang, Xiurong
    Wang, Li
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 134 : 1068 - 1078
  • [10] Valuing Investments in Multi-Energy Conversion, Storage, and Demand-Side Management Systems Under Uncertainty
    Kienzle, Florian
    Ahcin, Peter
    Andersson, Goeran
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2011, 2 (02) : 194 - 202