Contributions to a quality description of areal objects in spatial data sets

被引:12
作者
Ragia, L [1 ]
Winter, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Photogrammetry, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
spatial data quality; comparison of spatial entities; building extraction;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-2716(00)00020-4
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present a quality evaluation of two-dimensional building acquisition. We propose methods for identification and quantification of differences between independently acquired regions, and we present a systematic classification of those differences. Differences between acquired sets R-j = {r(i)}(j) of region r(ij) depend on the context of observation, on the technique of observation, etc. We distinguish topological and geometrical differences. Topological differences refer to the interior structure of a set of regions as well as to the structure of the boundary of a single region. Geometrical differences refer to the location of the boundary of a single region or of a set of regions, independent of their representation and of the structure of the boundaries. Identification of differences requires a matching of two data sets R-1 and R-2, which is done here by weighted topological relationships. For the identification of topological differences between two sets R-1 and R-2 of regions, we use the two region adjacency graphs (RAGs). For an identification of geometrical differences, we use the zone skeleton between two matched subsets r(p1) and r(q2) of the given sets. The zone skeleton is labeled with the local distances of the corresponding boundaries of the subsets; especially, we investigate its density function. An example based on two real data sets of acquired ground plans of buildings, shows the feasibility of the approach. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 213
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Aalders H, 1996, P 7 INT S SPAT DAT H
  • [2] Baarda W., 1967, Statistical concepts in geodesy, V2
  • [3] BRUNS HT, 1996, ADV GIS RES, P173
  • [4] BURROUGH PA, 1996, GEOGRAPHIC OBJECTS I, V2, P3
  • [5] EGENHOFER M, 1997, ASSESSMENT SCENE SIM
  • [6] TOPOLOGICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN REGIONS WITH HOLES
    EGENHOFER, MJ
    CLEMENTINI, E
    DIFELICE, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1994, 8 (02): : 129 - 142
  • [7] POINT-SET TOPOLOGICAL SPATIAL RELATIONS
    EGENHOFER, MJ
    FRANZOSA, RD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1991, 5 (02): : 161 - 174
  • [8] FUCHS C, 1994, INT ARCH PHOTOGR REM, V30, P257
  • [9] GLEMSER M, 1993, SALZBURGER GEOGR MAT, V20, P97
  • [10] Goodchild M.F., 1997, GEOGRAPHICAL ENV MOD, V1, P5, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10708-007-9111-Y