A landscape approach for cost-effective large-scale forest restoration

被引:102
作者
Molin, Paulo Guilherme [1 ,2 ]
Chazdon, Robin [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
de Barros Ferraz, Silvio Frosini [2 ]
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Nat Sci, Campina Do Monte Alegre, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Forest Sci, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Piracicaba, Brazil
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT USA
[4] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] World Resources Inst, Global Restorat Initiat, Washington, DC 20006 USA
关键词
agricultural production; carbon sequestration; cost-effective; forest restoration; landscape connectivity; landscape restoration; low-cost restoration; natural regeneration; BRAZILIAN ATLANTIC FOREST; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; TROPICAL FORESTS; SAO-PAULO; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONNECTIVITY; OPPORTUNITIES; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13263
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Achieving global targets for forest restoration will require cost-effective strategies to return agricultural land to forest, while minimizing implementation costs and negative outcomes for agricultural production. 2. We present a landscape approach for optimizing the cost-effectiveness of large-scale forest restoration. Across three different landscapes within Brazil's Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot, we modelled landscape scenarios based on spatially explicit data on the probability of natural regeneration, restoration costs, land opportunity costs, and forest restoration outcomes for increasing carbon stocking and landscape connectivity. We compare benefits of our cost-reduction approach to the legally mandated riparian restoration and randomly distributed approaches. 3. Compared with riparian prioritization and considering both implementation and opportunity costs, our cost-reduction scenario produced the greatest savings (20.9%) in mechanized agricultural landscapes. 4. When only considering implementation costs, our cost-reduction scenario led to the highest savings (38.4%) in the landscape with highest forest cover where natural regeneration potential is highest and enables cost-effective carbon stocking and connectivity. 5. Synthesis and applications. We present a guide for forest restoration planning that maximizes specific outcomes with minimal costs and reduction of agricultural production. Furthermore, we show how policies could encourage prioritization of low-cost restoration via natural regeneration, increasing cost-effectiveness. While our study focuses on Brazil's Atlantic Forest, the approach can be parameterized for other regions.
引用
收藏
页码:2767 / 2778
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Freitas F., 2017, MALHA FUNDIARIA BRAS
[22]   Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps [J].
Hagen, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2003, 17 (03) :235-249
[23]   When and where to actively restore ecosystems? [J].
Holl, K. D. ;
Aide, T. M. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 261 (10) :1558-1563
[24]   Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up [J].
Holl, Karen D. .
SCIENCE, 2017, 355 (6324) :455-456
[25]  
IBGE, 2013, IBGE DOWNL
[26]   Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives [J].
Joly, Carlos A. ;
Metzger, Jean Paul ;
Tabarelli, Marcelo .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2014, 204 (03) :459-473
[27]  
Laestadius L., 2011, Unasylva, V62, P238
[28]   Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes [J].
Lamb, D ;
Erskine, PD ;
Parrotta, JA .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5754) :1628-1632
[29]   Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes [J].
Latawiec, Agnieszka E. ;
Strassburg, Bernardo B. N. ;
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
Rodrigues, Ricardo R. ;
Gardner, Toby .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 13 (04) :211-218
[30]   Suriname: Reconciling agricultural development and conservation of unique natural wealth [J].
Latawiec, Agnieszka Ewa ;
Strassburg, Bernardo B. N. ;
Rodriguez, Ana Maria ;
Matt, Elah ;
Nijbroek, Ravic ;
Silos, Maureen .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 38 :627-636