A landscape approach for cost-effective large-scale forest restoration

被引:101
作者
Molin, Paulo Guilherme [1 ,2 ]
Chazdon, Robin [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
de Barros Ferraz, Silvio Frosini [2 ]
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Nat Sci, Campina Do Monte Alegre, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Forest Sci, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Piracicaba, Brazil
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT USA
[4] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] World Resources Inst, Global Restorat Initiat, Washington, DC 20006 USA
关键词
agricultural production; carbon sequestration; cost-effective; forest restoration; landscape connectivity; landscape restoration; low-cost restoration; natural regeneration; BRAZILIAN ATLANTIC FOREST; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; TROPICAL FORESTS; SAO-PAULO; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONNECTIVITY; OPPORTUNITIES; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13263
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Achieving global targets for forest restoration will require cost-effective strategies to return agricultural land to forest, while minimizing implementation costs and negative outcomes for agricultural production. 2. We present a landscape approach for optimizing the cost-effectiveness of large-scale forest restoration. Across three different landscapes within Brazil's Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot, we modelled landscape scenarios based on spatially explicit data on the probability of natural regeneration, restoration costs, land opportunity costs, and forest restoration outcomes for increasing carbon stocking and landscape connectivity. We compare benefits of our cost-reduction approach to the legally mandated riparian restoration and randomly distributed approaches. 3. Compared with riparian prioritization and considering both implementation and opportunity costs, our cost-reduction scenario produced the greatest savings (20.9%) in mechanized agricultural landscapes. 4. When only considering implementation costs, our cost-reduction scenario led to the highest savings (38.4%) in the landscape with highest forest cover where natural regeneration potential is highest and enables cost-effective carbon stocking and connectivity. 5. Synthesis and applications. We present a guide for forest restoration planning that maximizes specific outcomes with minimal costs and reduction of agricultural production. Furthermore, we show how policies could encourage prioritization of low-cost restoration via natural regeneration, increasing cost-effectiveness. While our study focuses on Brazil's Atlantic Forest, the approach can be parameterized for other regions.
引用
收藏
页码:2767 / 2778
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Deforestation and Reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001-2010)
    Aide, T. Mitchell
    Clark, Matthew L.
    Ricardo Grau, H.
    Lopez-Carr, David
    Levy, Marc A.
    Redo, Daniel
    Bonilla-Moheno, Martha
    Riner, George
    Andrade-Nunez, Maria J.
    Muniz, Maria
    [J]. BIOTROPICA, 2013, 45 (02) : 262 - 271
  • [2] Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research
    Arroyo-Rodriguez, Victor
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    Martinez-Ramos, Miguel
    Bongers, Frans
    Chazdon, Robin L.
    Meave, Jorge A.
    Norden, Natalia
    Santos, Braulio A.
    Leal, Inara R.
    Tabarelli, Marcelo
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2017, 92 (01) : 326 - 340
  • [3] ASTER GDEM Validation Team, 2009, ASTER GLOB DEM VAL S
  • [4] Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot
    Banks-Leite, Cristina
    Pardini, Renata
    Tambosi, Leandro R.
    Pearse, William D.
    Bueno, Adriana A.
    Bruscagin, Roberta T.
    Condez, Thais H.
    Dixo, Marianna
    Igari, Alexandre T.
    Martensen, Alexandre C.
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 345 (6200) : 1041 - 1045
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services
    Birch, Jennifer C.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Alvarez Aquino, Claudia
    Cantarello, Elena
    Echeverria, Cristian
    Kitzberger, Thomas
    Schiappacasse, Ignacio
    Garavito, Natalia Tejedor
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (50) : 21925 - 21930
  • [6] Bonham-Carter GraemeF., 1994, Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists
  • [7] ON THE NEED FOR INNOVATION IN ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    van Melis, Juliano
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2017, 102 (02) : 227 - 236
  • [8] Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Schweizer, Daniella
    Gaudare, Ulysse
    Mangueira, Julia R.
    Lamonato, Fernando
    Farah, Fabiano T.
    Nave, Andre G.
    Rodrigues, Ricardo R.
    [J]. BIOTROPICA, 2016, 48 (06) : 856 - 867
  • [9] Burrough P.A., 2000, Principles of Geographic Information Systems
  • [10] Emerging Threats and Opportunities for Large-Scale Ecological Restoration in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil
    Calmon, Miguel
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Paese, Adriana
    Aronson, James
    Castro, Pedro
    da Silva, Sabrina C.
    Rodrigues, Ricardo R.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 19 (02) : 154 - 158