Growth responses of cool-season grain legumes to transient waterlogging

被引:55
作者
Solaiman, Z.
Colmer, T. D.
Loss, S. P.
Thomson, B. D.
Siddique, K. H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Plant Biol, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Inst Agr, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] CSBP, Kwinana, WA 6966, Australia
[4] Milne AgriGrp Pty Ltd, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Legumes Mediterranean Agr, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 2007年 / 58卷 / 05期
关键词
adventitious roots; aerenchyma; waterlogging tolerance;
D O I
10.1071/AR06330
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Transient waterlogging reduces the yield of cool-season grain legumes in several parts of the world. The tolerance of grain legumes to waterlogging may vary between and within species. This study investigated the effects of 7 days of waterlogging and subsequent recovery ( 10 days) on plant growth to evaluate the variation in tolerance among 7 cool- season grain legume species, in sand culture in glasshouse experiments. Additionally waterlogging tolerance of 6 faba bean genotypeswas also evaluated. Tolerance towaterlogging as indicated by root and shoot growth ( as% of drained controls) was ranked as follows: faba bean> yellow lupin> grass pea> narrow- leafed lupin> chickpea> lentil> field pea. Faba bean produced adventitious roots and aerenchyma leading to increased root porosity ( 9% gas volume per unit root volume). Among the 6 faba bean genotypes screened, accession 794 showed the best waterlogging tolerance, but it was also the slowest growing accession, which might have contributed to apparent tolerance ( i. e. growth as % drained control). It is concluded that waterlogging tolerance in grain legumes varied between and within species, with faba bean being the most tolerant. The variation in tolerance identified within the limited set of faba bean genotypes evaluated suggests scope for further genetic improvement of tolerance in this species.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 412
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF OXYGEN DEFICIENCY ON UPTAKE AND DISTRIBUTION OF NUTRIENTS IN MAIZE PLANTS [J].
ATWELL, BJ ;
STEER, BT .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1990, 122 (01) :1-8
[2]   The interaction between waterlogging and salinity in higher plants: causes, consequences and implications [J].
Barrett-Lennard, EG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2003, 253 (01) :35-54
[3]   EFFECTS OF WATERLOGGING AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEAS (PISUM-SATIVUM-L) [J].
BELFORD, RK ;
CANNELL, RQ ;
THOMSON, RJ ;
DENNIS, CW .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1980, 31 (09) :857-869
[4]   Note on the effects of winter and spring waterlogging on growth, chemical composition and yield of rapeseed [J].
Boem, FHG ;
Lavado, RS ;
Porcelli, CA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 47 (2-3) :175-179
[5]   EFFECTS OF WATERLOGGING ON SOIL AERATION AND ON ROOT AND SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF WINTER OATS (AVENA-SATIVA L) [J].
CANNELL, RQ ;
BELFORD, RK ;
BLACKWELL, PS ;
GOVI, G ;
THOMSON, RJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1985, 85 (03) :361-373
[6]   Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots [J].
Colmer, TD .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 26 (01) :17-36
[7]   Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) tolerates waterlogging better than narrow-leafed lupin (L-angustifolius) -: II.: Leaf gas exchange, plant water status, and nitrogen accumulation [J].
Davies, CL ;
Turner, DW ;
Dracup, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (06) :711-719
[8]   CURRENT AND FUTURE STRATEGIES IN BREEDING LENTIL FOR RESISTANCE TO BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC STRESSES [J].
ERSKINE, W ;
TUFAIL, M ;
RUSSELL, A ;
TYAGI, MC ;
RAHMAN, MM ;
SAXENA, MC .
EUPHYTICA, 1994, 73 (1-2) :127-135
[9]  
Fisher RA, 1921, ANN APPL BIOL, V7, P367, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1744-7348.1921.TB05524.X
[10]  
Geletu Bejiga, 1995, Lens Newsletter, V22, P8