Studying the Past: the Nature and Development of Legal History as an Academic Discipline

被引:10
作者
Rose, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sandra Day OConnor Coll Law, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
TRADITION; RISE;
D O I
10.1080/01440365.2010.496925
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
This article pursues two themes. First, it argues that there is a commonality between the general interest in the past, the interest of historians, and the interest of legal historians. Second, it shows that several ideas about the past commonly appear in all three contexts. In pursuing these themes, the article begins by reviewing the initial study of the past and the emergence of history and legal history in academia. It explores the various reasons why the early historians and later academic historians and legal historians studied the past and the different ways in which they used it. The article then pursues in more detail the development of Anglo-American legal history as a scholarly tradition. It identifies three types of academic legal history: classical, liberal, and critical, and discusses their natures and different uses of the past. Finally, the article explores the substantial legal history scholarship and its relevance to scholars who are not legal historians. The article concludes by stressing the importance of studying the legal past.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 128
页数:28
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Alexander GregoryS., 1997, Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970
[2]  
[Anonymous], CURSE HIST
[3]  
[Anonymous], LAW HIST REV
[4]  
BAKER W, 2000, CAMBRIDGE LAW J, V83, P62
[5]  
BANNER S, 1998, WASHINGTON LAW Q, V76, P42
[6]  
Banner Stuart., 1998, Washington University Law Quarterly, V76, P37
[7]  
BARTLETT R, 2004, HIST HISTORIANS SELE, P14
[8]  
Biancalana Joseph., 2001, The Fee Tail and the Common Recovery in Medieval England
[9]  
BILDER MS, 2004, 3RANSATLANTIC CONSTI
[10]  
BLACKSTONE W, 1764, COMMENTARIES LAWS EN, V1