Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment

被引:6
作者
Geavlete, Bogdan
Ene, Cosmin [1 ]
Iordache, Valentin
Geavlete, Petrisor
机构
[1] St John Clin Hosp Emergency, Dept Urol, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
single use flexible ureteroscope; lithiasis; no touch technique; DIFFICULT URETER; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.21614/chirurgia.116.3.354
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introdution: Single-use flexible ureteroscopes (SU-fURS) seems to overcome the main limitations of conventional reusable ureteroscopes in terms of acquisition and maintenance costs and breakages. Our aim was to analyz the efficiency and safety of the thinnest single use flexible scope from Pusen: Uscope Pusen, PU 3033A (Tip = 7.5 Fr.). Material and methods: We analyzed data from 24 patients with pyelocaliceal stones from January to March 2021. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (range 27 to 71 years). There were unique stones, 7 pyelic, 10 in inferior calyx, 4 in the middle calyx and 3 in superior calyx. The average stone size (larger diameter) was 18 mm (12-26 mm). We used Uscope Pusen 7.5 Fr. (PU 3033A) and Dornier Medilas H Solvo laser. In all cases we applied no touch technique (NTT). We didn't used C-Arm for progression control of the ureteroscope. We evaluated the patients for stone-free rate (SFR), mean operation time and complication rate. Results: The average operative time was 72 +/- 21 minutes, range 66-131 min. For all 24 patients we didn't use wires or ureteral access sheath (NTT). Concerning the laser settings for dusting we used low energy: 0.5J, high frequency: 50 Hz, for pop-corning we used high energy: >1 J, medium frequency: 10-50 Hz, and for fragmenting high energy: >1 J, low frequency: <10 Hz. The stone-free status (residual fragments under 3 mm.) after one month was 91,7%. In 2 patients we need the second session with completely dusting of the residual stones. The visibility was optimal and we didn't describe any mucosal lesions of the ureter when we retired the scope. The intrarenal maneuverability was very good. Clavien I and II occurred in 6 patients. Conclusion: This new SU-fURS (7.5 Fr.) seems to be very effective and safe offering us an easy NTT. No ureteral damage and one day surgery are the main real minimally invasive characteristics of this ureteroscope.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes [J].
Al-Balushi, Khalid ;
Martin, Nathalie ;
Loubon, Helene ;
Baboudjian, Michael ;
Michel, Floriane ;
Sichez, Pierre-Clement ;
Martin, Thomas ;
Di-Crocco, Eugenie ;
Gaillet, Sarah ;
Delaporte, Veronique ;
Akiki, Akram ;
Faure, Alice ;
Karsenty, Gilles ;
Lechevallier, Eric ;
Boissier, Romain .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 51 (10) :1735-1741
[2]   Comparison of Different Ureteroscope Sizes in Treating Ureteral Calculi in Adult Patients [J].
Atis, Gokhan ;
Arikan, Ozgur ;
Gurbuz, Cenk ;
Yildirim, Asif ;
Erol, Bulent ;
Pelit, Sabri ;
Ulus, Ismail ;
Caskurlu, Turhan .
UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (06) :1231-1235
[3]   Frequency of Ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center [J].
Carey, Robert I. ;
Gomez, Christopher S. ;
Maurici, Giuseppe ;
Lynne, Charles M. ;
Leveillee, Raymond J. ;
Bird, Vincent G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (02) :607-610
[4]   The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting? [J].
Cetti, R. J. ;
Biers, S. ;
Keoghane, S. R. .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (01) :31-33
[5]   Is a Safety Wire Necessary During Routine Flexible Ureteroscopy? [J].
Dickstein, Rian J. ;
Kreshover, Jessica E. ;
Babayan, Richard K. ;
Wang, David S. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (10) :1589-1592
[6]   First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes [J].
Emiliani, Esteban ;
Mercade, Asier ;
Millan, Felix ;
Sanchez-Martin, Francisco ;
Andres Konstantinidis, Cristian ;
Angerri, Oriol .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 71 (02) :208-213
[7]   Single use and disposable flexible ureteroscopes [J].
Emiliani, Esteban ;
Traxer, Olivier .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) :176-181
[8]   Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis [J].
Hennessey, Derek B. ;
Fojecki, Grzegorz L. ;
Papa, Nathan P. ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Bolton, Damien .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 :55-61
[9]   Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study [J].
Kam, Jonathan ;
Yuminaga, Yuigi ;
Beattie, Kieran ;
Ling, Koi Yi ;
Arianayagam, Mohan ;
Canagasingham, Bertram ;
Ferguson, Richard ;
Varol, Celalettin ;
Khadra, Mohamed ;
Winter, Matthew ;
Ko, Raymond .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (10) :999-1005
[10]   Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi [J].
L'Esperance, JO ;
Ekeruo, WO ;
Scales, CD ;
Marguet, CG ;
Springhart, WP ;
Maloney, ME ;
Albala, DM ;
Preminger, GM .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) :252-255