Software process improvement with weak management support: an analysis of the dynamics of intra-organizational alliances in IS change initiatives

被引:13
作者
Ngwenyama, Ojelanki [2 ]
Norbjerg, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Sch Econ & Business Adm, Dept Informat, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Ryerson Univ, Inst Innovat & Technol Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Software Process Improvement; implementation management; change agentry; alliances; social capital; commitment; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; PERFORMANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; WORK; INVOLVEMENT; CENTRALITY; DIVERSITY; POLITICS; CREATION;
D O I
10.1057/ejis.2010.18
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software Process Improvement (SPI) projects are large-scale, complex organization-wide change initiatives. They require considerable investments in personnel, time and money and impact just about every aspect of software firms. The group charged with conducting an SPI project has, however, little formal authority to influence or force software professionals to engage in SPI work or to define and implement changes. The SPI literature suggests that successful SPI initiatives depend on strong commitment from top management. But what should the SPI group do if management support is weak? In this paper, we present an analysis of how an SPI group can use alliances to obtain influence and succeed when management support is weak. Our study is based on a 3-year longitudinal field study of SPI change initiatives at Denmark Electronics. Our findings show that a lack of top management support is not necessarily incompatible with success. This research opens an important new area of research on intra-organizational alliances and information system (IS) implementation. It has the potential to offer new theories and practical advice on how IS implementation projects can be more effectively managed. European Journal of Information Systems (2010) 19, 303-319. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.18; published online 27 April 2010
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 319
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] ABRAHAMSSON P, 2000, P 23 INF SYST RES SE, P487
  • [2] ABRAHAMSSON P, 2001, SCANDINAVIAN J INFOR, V13, P37
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, QUALITATIVE METHODS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, BOWLING ALONE BOWLIN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, SCANDINAVIAN J INFOR
  • [7] Action research
    Avison, D
    Lau, F
    Myers, M
    Nielsen, PA
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1999, 42 (01) : 94 - 97
  • [8] Balkundi P, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P49, DOI [10.2307/20159745, 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500]
  • [9] THE CASE RESEARCH STRATEGY IN STUDIES OF INFORMATION-SYSTEMS
    BENBASAT, I
    GOLDSTEIN, DK
    MEAD, M
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 1987, 11 (03) : 369 - 386
  • [10] BORJESSON G, 2004, INFORM TECHNOLOGY PE, V18, P359