Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up

被引:22
|
作者
Sheth, Mihir M. [1 ]
Heldt, Brett L. [2 ]
Spell, Jennifer H. [3 ]
Vidal, Emily A. [4 ,5 ]
Laughlin, Mitzi S. [4 ,5 ]
Morris, Brent J. [4 ,6 ]
Elkousy, Hussein A. [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Edwards, T. Bradley [4 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[4] FORI, 7401 S Main St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Texas Educ & Res Fdn Shoulder & Elbow Surg Inc TE, Houston, TX USA
[6] Baptist Hlth Lexington, Baptist Hlth Med Grp Orthoped & Sports Med, Lexington, KY USA
[7] Texas Orthoped Hosp, Fondren Orthoped Grp, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; clinical outcomes; clinical decision; patient-reported outcome measures; patient satisfaction; ROTATOR CUFF DEFICIENCY; REVISION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been shown to reliably improve pain and functional outcomes for multiple pathologies. Despite its increasing use in the United States since its introduction in 2004, few studies have investigated long-term outcomes of this procedure. This information is vital in many ways, including durability of functional outcomes, complication profiles, and implant survivorship. Methods: Our prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty registry included 471 patients who had undergone RSA prior to December 31, 2010, by a single surgeon at a high-volume shoulder arthroplasty center. The study sample included 94 patients with a minimum of 10 years' follow-up, and we evaluated the indications for RSA, complications, pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and patient satisfaction on these patients at baseline, 2-5 years, and 10 or more years of follow-up. Prosthesis survivorship was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed with revision for any reason as the end point for all 471 patients in the study period regardless of follow-up interval. Results: The 93 patients with at least 10 years of follow-up were 63% female (60) and 37% male (34), with an average age of 66 +/- 10 years at the time of RSA. There were 70 (75%) primary RSAs and 23 (25%) revision RSAs. Patient-reported outcome measures at 10 years or more included a current pain rating averaging 2 +/- 3 on a 0-10 scale and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) of 73 +/- 28. There was no deterioration in function or pain from midterm to long-term follow-up, as the SANE and pain score changed by less than the minimal clinically important difference or improved in 87% and 90% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients were satisfied with the RSA procedure, with 52 (56%) very satisfied, 24 (26%) satisfied, 13 (14%) dissatisfied, and 4 (4%) very dissatisfied. For the subset of 68 patients who were contacted for follow-up, 64 (94%) would have the procedure again and 4 (6%) would not. Kaplan-Meier prosthesis survival rate for all 471 RSA patients was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84%-92%) at 5 years and 81% (95% CI 74%-86%) at 10 years. Conclusions: This study presents the largest American cohort of Grammont design RSA at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Although RSA provided clinically significant and durable improvements in pain and function, the complication and revision rates were higher than prior reports. Despite this, the vast majority of patients were satisfied and would have the procedure again. (C) 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 883
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: 2-to 12-year follow-up
    Otto, Randall J.
    Clark, Rachel E.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (05) : 792 - 797
  • [22] Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with prior anterior shoulder instability: minimum 5-year follow-up
    Vopat, Matthew L.
    Hanson, Jared A.
    Fossum, Bradley W.
    Hazra, Rony-Orijit Dey
    Peebles, Annalise M.
    Horan, Marilee P.
    Foster, Michael J.
    Jildeh, Toufic R.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Millett, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (03) : 657 - 665
  • [23] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex fractures of the proximal humerus: results after 7 years of follow-up
    Izquierdo-Fernandez, Alberto
    Gomez-Rodriguez, Marta
    Urbano-Luque, Maite
    Garcia-Carmona, Manuel
    Quevedo-Reinoso, Rafael
    Carlos Minarro, Jose
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [24] Reconstruction by allograft-prosthetic composite reverse shoulder arthroplasty after proximal humerus tumor resection: Clinical and radiographic assessment at a minimum 2 years' follow-up
    Callamand, Gabriel
    Barret, Hugo
    Saint-Genez, Florian
    Bonnevialle, Paul
    Mansat, Pierre
    Bonnevialle, Nicolas
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (04)
  • [25] Clinical implications of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Shelley, Robert J.
    DeFoor, Mikalyn T.
    Parada, Stephen A.
    Crosby, Lynn A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 21 : 384 - 389
  • [26] Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up
    Merolla, Giovanni
    Walch, Gilles
    Ascione, Francesco
    Paladini, Paolo
    Fabbri, Elisabetta
    Padolino, Antonio
    Porcellini, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (04) : 701 - 710
  • [27] Neck shaft angle in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 135 vs. 145 degrees at minimum 2-year follow-up
    Neyton, Lionel
    Nigues, Ana
    McBride, Andrew P.
    de Sanctis, Edoardo Giovannetti
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (07) : 1486 - 1493
  • [28] Predictors of patient satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Rauck, Ryan C.
    Ruzbarsky, Joseph J.
    Swarup, Ishaan
    Gruskay, Jordan
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Warren, Russell F.
    Dines, David M.
    Gulotta, Lawrence, V
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (03) : E67 - E74
  • [29] Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a follow-up of the first 50 cases by a single surgeon
    West, Jacob A.
    Scudday, Travis
    Anderson, Scott
    Amin, Nirav H.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (04) : 1667 - 1676
  • [30] Return to Sports After Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Outcomes at Mean 4-Year Follow-up
    Tangtiphaiboontana, Jennifer
    Mara, Kristin C.
    Jensen, Andrew R.
    Camp, Christopher L.
    Morrey, Mark E.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (06)