The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain management programme managing chronic pain on pain perceptions, health-related quality of life and stages of change-A non-randomized controlled study

被引:44
作者
Dysvik, Elin [1 ]
Kvaloy, Jan Terje [2 ]
Stokkeland, Ragnhild [3 ]
Natvig, Gerd Karin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Fac Social Sci, Dept Hlth Studies, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Stavanger, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Math & Nat Sci, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Stavanger, Norway
[4] Univ Bergen, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Chronic pain; Clinical significance; Health-related quality of life; Multidisciplinary pain management programme; Pain perception; Stages of change; RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; CHANGE QUESTIONNAIRE; CHANGE MODEL; READINESS; TRANSLATION; ARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been useful in the treatment of chronic pain conditions for many years Given the increasing number of persons with chronic pain and associated psychosocial problems, the development and implementation of effective interventions based on CBT is warranted Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary pain management programme on health-related quality of life (HRQL), as measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), pain perception as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and readiness-to-change as measured by the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Design A pretest-post-test quasi-experimental design, with waiting list controls and baseline and post-test measures, was used Setting The study was conducted in the rehabilitation unit of a university hospital Participants Of 117 people suffering from chronic pain, 113 completed the 8-week multidisciplinary pain management programme The patients were consecutive referrals Inclusion item were adults (18-67 years), pain lasting over 6 months, motivation and no ongoing litigation. Exclusion criteria were affected by major mental disorders or major medical conditions requiring treatment Methods The intervention was based on a cognitive behavioural approach Therapeutic dialogues and training, combined with physical activity, were provided to a fixed plan. including homework The programme has several features that directly address psychosocial aspects of chronic pain. Statistical and clinical significance are considered. Results The findings suggest that this programme has the potential to improve HRQL, reduce pain intensity and interference, and contribute to improvement in readiness-to-change Statistically significant results are supplemented by results showing their clinical significance Conclusions Improvements in HRQL, pain-related disability, and readiness-to-change suggest that the vicious cycle of chronic pain may be alleviated by our programme. As we see it, effective treatment results are about identifying and addressing the important and changeable influences maintaining pain problems such as acceptance, understanding the mind-body connection and self-management Although further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this work, such group approaches appear to represent a feasible treatment option for many patients with chronic pain (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 835
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] ANDERSON KO, 2001, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT, P579
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, MANUAL INTERPRETATIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, SF 36 PHYS MENTAL HL
  • [5] Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
    Breivik, H
    Collett, B
    Ventafridda, V
    Cohen, R
    Gallacher, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 10 (04) : 287 - 333
  • [6] Nurses' in the multi-professional pain team: A study of attitudes, beliefs and treatment endorsements
    Brown, CA
    Richardson, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 10 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [7] BUTLER OS, 2003, EXPLAIN PAIN
  • [8] Dunajcik L., 1999, PAIN, V2nd, P467
  • [9] DWORKIN RH, 2001, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT, P659
  • [10] Dysvik Elin, 2004, Int J Nurs Pract, V10, P224, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00485.x