Despite Equivalent Medicare Reimbursement, Facility Costs for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Higher Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Background: With the recent removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Only list, facility reimbursement for outpatient TKA now falls under the Outpatient Prospective Payment System at the same rate as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to compare true facility costs of patients undergoing outpatient TKA with those undergoing UKA. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 2310 outpatient TKA and 231 UKA patients from 2018 to 2019. Outpatient status was defined as a hospital stay of less than 2 midnights. Facility costs were calculated using a time-driven, activity-based costing algorithm. Implants, supplies, medications, and personnel costs were compared between outpatient TKA and UKA patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding medical and demographic variables. Results: When compared with patients undergoing UKA, outpatient TKA patients had higher implant costs ($3403 vs $3081; P<.001) and overall hospital costs ($6350 vs $5594; P<.001). Outpatient TKA patients had a greater length of stay (1.2 vs 0.5 days; P<.001) and greater postoperative personnel costs ($783 vs $166; P<.001) than UKA patients. When controlling for comorbidities, outpatient TKA was associated with a $803 (P<.001) increase in overall facility costs compared with UKA. Conclusion: Despite equivalent reimbursement from CMS as UKA, outpatient TKA has increased facility costs to the hospital. Although implant costs can vary greatly by institution, CMS should consider appropriately reimbursing outpatient TKA for the additional personnel costs when compared with UKA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.