Solar feed-in tariffs in a post-grid parity world: The role of risk, investor diversity and business models

被引:136
作者
Karneyeva, Yuliya [1 ]
Wuestenhagen, Rolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Chair Management Renewable Energies, Tigerbergstr 2, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Solar photovoltaics; Investment; Business model; Germany; Italy; Switzerland; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; POLICY; SUPPORT; SYSTEM; DIFFUSION; CLIMATE; CHOICE; SCHEME; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, feed-in tariffs have spurred significant deployment of solar photovoltaics in Germany and other countries. With recent cost trends, several countries are approaching retail grid parity. Some policymakers conclude that now is the time to remove feed-in tariffs, as grid parity creates a self-sustaining market, where economically rational investors will invest even in the absence of government incentives. Recent experience in key European solar markets, however, shows that with the advent of grid parity and the reduction of feed-in tariffs, investment in new solar capacity has decreased rather than increased, making it questionable whether low-carbon energy policy targets will be reached. We conduct a cross-case study analysis of three PV markets Germany, Italy and Switzerland to investigate the role of feed-in tariffs for the near- and post-grid parity stages of diffusion, accounting for investor diversity and distinguishing between implications for revenue-based and savings-based business models. We find that recent market trends are strongly driven by increased levels of risk, especially policy risk and exposure to revenue risk. We therefore suggest that relatively frugal but stable policy environments may be conducive to further growth of investment in photovoltaics and minimize cost to society.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 456
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
AEEG, 2015, CONTR MAGG GRUPP GEN
[2]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[3]   Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells [J].
Andersson, BA ;
Jacobsson, S .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (14) :1037-1049
[4]  
Andor K, 2016, EFFEKTE EIGENVERBRAU
[5]  
Andor MA., 2016, RUHR EC PAPERS
[6]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY J
[7]  
[Anonymous], FED COUNC DEC GRAD P
[8]  
[Anonymous], SOL GEN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, RENEWABLE POWER GENE
[10]   Photovoltaic energy policy: Financial estimation and performance comparison of the public support in five representative countries [J].
Avril, S. ;
Mansilla, C. ;
Busson, M. ;
Lemaire, T. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :244-258