Model uncertainty and liquidity

被引:70
作者
Routledge, Bryan R. [1 ]
Zin, Stanley E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] New York Univ, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Liquidity; Value-at-Risk; Knightian uncertainty; Derivatives; Market microstructure; EXPECTED UTILITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.red.2008.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets like the market for mortgage backed securities or credit derivatives. Moreover, the observed behavior of traders and institutions that places a large emphasis on "worst-case scenarios" through the use of "stress testing" and "Value-at-Risk" seems different than Savage expected utility would suggest. In this paper, we capture model-uncertainty using an Epstein and Wang [Epstein, L. G., Wang, T., 1994. Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty. Econometrica 62, 283-322] uncertainty-averse utility function with an ambiguous underlying asset-returns distribution. To explore the connection of uncertainty with liquidity, we specify a simple market where a monopolist financial intermediary makes a market for a propriety derivative security. The market-maker chooses bid and ask prices for the derivative, then, conditional on trade in this market, chooses an optimal portfolio and consumption. We explore how uncertainty can increase the bid-ask spread and, hence, reduces liquidity. Our infinite-horizon example produces short, dramatic decreases in liquidity even though the underlying environment is stationary. We show how these liquidity crises are closely linked to the uncertainty aversion effect on the optimal portfolio. Effectively, the uncertainty aversion can, at times, limit the ability of the market-maker to hedge a position and thus reduces the desirability of trade, and hence, liquidity. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 566
页数:24
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Backus DK, 2005, NBER MACROEC ANN-SER, V19, P319
[2]  
*BANK INT SETTL, 1999, REV FIN MARK EV AUT
[3]   Value-at-risk-based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices [J].
Basak, S ;
Shapiro, A .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2001, 14 (02) :371-405
[4]  
BECKER T, 2000, FOREIGN EXCHANGE BID
[5]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[6]  
Choquet G., 1954, Ann. Inst. Fourier, V5, P131, DOI DOI 10.5802/AIF.53
[7]   EXCESS VOLATILITY OF STOCK-PRICES AND KNIGHTIAN UNCERTAINTY [J].
DOW, J ;
WERLANG, SRD .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1992, 36 (2-3) :631-638
[8]   UNCERTAINTY AVERSION, RISK-AVERSION, AND THE OPTIMAL CHOICE OF PORTFOLIO [J].
DOW, J ;
WERLANG, SRD .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (01) :197-204
[9]   RISK, AMBIGUITY, AND THE SAVAGE AXIOMS [J].
ELLSBERG, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1961, 75 (04) :643-669
[10]   Learning under ambiguity [J].
Epstein, Larry G. ;
Schneider, Martin .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2007, 74 (04) :1275-1303