Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Angles, Part 1 Biomechanical Evaluation for Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction

被引:47
作者
Kennedy, Nicholas I. [1 ]
LaPrade, Robert F. [1 ]
Goldsmith, Mary T. [1 ]
Faucett, Scott C. [1 ]
Rasmussen, Matthew T. [1 ]
Coatney, Garrett A. [1 ]
Engebretsen, Lars [1 ]
Wijdicks, Coen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Steadman Philippon Res Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Vail, CO 81657 USA
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); single-bundle PCL reconstruction; graft fixation angles; knee kinematics; graft forces; anterolateral bundle (ALB); IN-VITRO; POSTEROMEDIAL BUNDLES; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; TENDON GRAFT; KNEE; TUNNEL; OUTCOMES; FLEXION; INJURY; JOINT;
D O I
10.1177/0363546514541225
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently, no consensus exists for the optimal graft fixation angle for anatomic single-bundle (SB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (PCLRs). Additionally, direct graft forces have not been measured. Alternative graft fixation angles and the resultant graft forces should be investigated to optimize the stability of SB PCLRs without overconstraining the knee. Hypothesis: Graft fixation angles of 75 degrees, 90 degrees, and 105 degrees for SB PCLR were hypothesized to improve knee stability compared with the sectioned posterior cruciate ligament state with no evidence of knee overconstraint. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically evaluated for the intact, sectioned, and SB PCLR states with the anterolateral bundle graft fixed at 75 degrees, 90 degrees, and 105 degrees. A 6 degrees of freedom robotic system assessed knee laxity with a 134-N posterior load applied at 0 degrees to 120 degrees and 5-N<bold>m external</bold>, 5-N<bold>m internal</bold>, and 10-N<bold>m valgus rotation torques applied at </bold>60 degrees to 120 degrees. By securing the graft to an external load cell, graft forces were measured throughout kinematic testing. Results: No significant kinematic differences were found among the 3 fixation angles. Each fixation angle resulted in significantly less posterior translation than in the sectioned state at all flexion angles (P < .05), with 4.1 mm of average residual laxity during an applied posterior loading. For all graft fixation angles, internal rotation was significantly increased between 60 degrees and 120 degrees of flexion, and external rotation was significantly increased at 90 degrees, 105 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion compared with the intact state. Graft forces were not significantly different among the 3 fixation angles and remained below reported loads observed during activities of daily living. Conclusion: All tested SB PCLR graft fixation angles restored knee laxity to similar levels; however, persistent laxity resulted in significant increases in knee laxity compared with the intact state during posterior tibial loading at all flexion angles, internal rotation at flexion angles 60 degrees, and external rotation at 75 degrees of flexion. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that SB PCL graft fixation angles of 75 degrees, 90 degrees, and 105 degrees were comparable in restoring knee kinematics and exposed the graft to similar time-zero loads. However, SB PCLRs did not fully reduce knee laxity to the intact state.
引用
收藏
页码:2338 / 2345
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Codominance of the individual posterior cruciate ligament bundles - An analysis of bundle lengths and orientation
    Ahmad, CS
    Cohen, ZA
    Levine, WN
    Gardner, TR
    Ateshian, GA
    Mow, VC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (02) : 221 - 225
  • [2] Arthroscopically Pertinent Anatomy of the Anterolateral and Posteromedial Bundles of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament
    Anderson, Colin J.
    Ziegler, Connor G.
    Wijdicks, Coen A.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (21) : 1936 - 1945
  • [3] A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques
    Bergfeld, JA
    Graham, SM
    Parker, RD
    Valdevit, ADC
    Kambic, HE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (07) : 976 - 981
  • [4] Long-term outcomes following single-bundle transtibial arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Boutefnouchet, Tarek
    Bentayeb, Malek
    Qadri, Qutub
    Ali, Salman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 337 - 343
  • [5] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation - 2-to 10-year follow-up
    Cooper, DE
    Stewart, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (02) : 346 - 360
  • [6] Dennis Michael G, 2004, J Knee Surg, V17, P133
  • [7] POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES IN TRAUMA PATIENTS .2.
    FANELLI, GC
    EDSON, CJ
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (05): : 526 - 529
  • [8] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - An in vitro study of femoral and tibial graft placement
    Galloway, MT
    Grood, ES
    Mehalik, JN
    Levy, M
    Saddler, SC
    Noyes, FR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [9] Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics After Reconstruction of an Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury In Vivo Analysis During Lunge
    Gill, Thomas J.
    Van de Velde, Samuel K.
    Wing, David W.
    Oh, Luke S.
    Hosseini, Ali
    Li, Guoan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (12) : 2377 - 2385
  • [10] GIRGIS FG, 1975, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P216