Working conditions in hydrogen production: A social life cycle assessment

被引:34
作者
Werker, Jasmin [1 ]
Wulf, Christina [1 ]
Zapp, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Syst Anal & Technol Eva, D-52425 Julich, Germany
关键词
alternative fuels; case study; hydrogen; industrial ecology; life cycle thinking; social life cycle assessment; INDICATORS; IMPACTS; COUNTRY;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12840
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social impacts of novel technology can, parallel to environmental and economic consequences, influence its sustainability. By analyzing the case of hydrogen production by advanced alkaline water electrolysis (AEL) from a life cycle perspective, this paper illustrates the social implications of the manufacturing of the electrolyzer and hydrogen production when installed in Germany, Austria, and Spain. This paper complements previous environmental and economic assessments, which selected this set of countries based on their different structures in electricity production. The paper uses a mixed method design to analyze the social impact for the workers along the process chain. Appropriate indicators related to working conditions are selected on the basis of the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The focus on workers is chosen as a first example to test the relatively new Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment (PSILCA) database version 2.0. The results of the quantitative assessment are then complemented and compared through an investigation of the underlying raw data and a qualitative literature analysis. Overall, advanced AEL is found to have least social impact along the German process chain, followed by the Spanish and the Austrian. All three process chains show impacts on global upstream processes. In order to reduce social impact and ultimately contribute to Sustainable Development, policymakers and industry need to work together to further improve certain aspects of working conditions in different locations, particularly within global upstream processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1052 / 1061
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Aaronson S. A., 2010, GLOBAL EC J, V10, P3
  • [2] Anker R, 2013, SHARED APPROACH ESTI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products
  • [4] Baeyens An, 2015, Eur J Health Law, V22, P508
  • [5] Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains: Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Cavan, Deana Aulisio
    Norris, Gregory
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (09): : 1946 - 1965
  • [6] The Development of Collective Bargaining in China: From "Collective Bargaining by Riot" to "Party State-led Wage Bargaining"*
    Chan, Chris King-Chi
    Hui, Elaine Sio-Ieng
    [J]. CHINA QUARTERLY, 2014, 217 : 221 - 242
  • [7] Gender wage gaps, 'sticky floors' and 'glass ceilings' in Europe
    Christofides, Louis N.
    Polycarpou, Alexandros
    Vrachimis, Konstantinos
    [J]. LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2013, 21 : 86 - 102
  • [8] Social Life Cycle Assessment of a Concentrated Solar Power Plant in Spain: A Methodological Proposal
    Corona, Blanca
    Bozhilova-Kisheva, Kossara P.
    Olsen, Stig I.
    San Miguel, Guillermo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (06) : 1566 - 1577
  • [9] Dreyer LC, 2006, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V11, P88, DOI 10.1065/lca2005.08.223
  • [10] EC, 2018, GEND PAY GAP SIT EU