Methodological studies evaluating evidence are not systematic reviews

被引:16
作者
Puljak, Livia [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Croatia, Ctr Evidence Based Med & Hlth Care, Ilica 242, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 99
页数:3
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[2]   In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance [J].
Propadalo, Ivana ;
Tranfic, Mia ;
Vuka, Ivana ;
Barcot, Ognjen ;
Pericic, Tina Poklepovic ;
Puljak, Livia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 106 :10-17
[3]   Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe [J].
Puljak, Livia ;
Sapunar, Damir .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[4]   Survey of Cochrane protocols found methods for data extraction from figures not mentioned or unclear [J].
Vucic, Katarina ;
Kadic, Antonia Jelicic ;
Puljak, Livia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (10) :1161-1164