Intratumoral vascularity of experimentally induced VX2 carcinoma - Comparison of color doppler sonography, power doppler sonography, and microangiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Tumor vascularity is useful for characterizing tumors and determining tumor management. The recent development of power Doppler sonography has enhanced the sensitivity of color Doppler imaging in the detection of blood flow because of low power noise and less angle dependence. The purpose of this study was to compare the capability of color and power Doppler sonography with that of microangiography for showing tumor vascularity of VX2 carcinoma. METHODS. Color and power Doppler sonography was performed on VX2 carcinomas in the rabbit thighs, and their findings were correlated with those of microangiography. For qualitative analysis, tumor vascularity was categorized into four items including distribution of tumor vessels, crowdedness of vessels, small vessels, (greater than or equal to 0.1 mm), and micro-vessels (< 0.1 mm). Tumor blood flow signals of color Doppler sonography and power Doppler sonography were graded as 3, 2, 1, and 0 and were compared with tumor vascularity on microangiography. For quantitative analysis, percentages of tumor vascular area per tumor area on each study were compared. RESULTS. The mean scores of tumor vascularity on power Doppler sonography were 2.87, 2.73, 2.93, and 2.73 in tumor vascular distribution, crowdedness of vessels, small vessels, and micro-vessels, respectively. Those on color Doppler sonography were 2.4, 2.2, 2.8, and 1.67, respectively. Power Doppler sonography was statistically superior to color Doppler sonography in displaying tumor vascular distribution (P < 0.05) and micro-vessels (P < 0.01). The means and medians of percentages of tumor vascular area per tumor area were 22.7% and 23.5% on microangiography, 17.9% and 21.4% on color Doppler sonography, and 36.4% and 34.7% on power Doppler sonography, respectively. Percentages of tumor vascular area per tumor area on both color Doppler sonography (r = 0.70) and power Doppler sonography (r = 0.84) were well correlated with those on microangiography. CONCLUSIONS. Power Doppler sonography can demonstrate the tumor vascularity on microangiography relatively well, however, it tends to overestimate the blood flow signals. Color Doppler sonography may have some limitations in imaging tumor vascular distribution and micro-vessels and tends to underestimate tumor vascularity, but can display the blood flow direction. Therefore, power Doppler and color Doppler sonography could complement each other in demonstrating the tumor vascularity.