Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations

被引:144
作者
Jung, Malte F. [1 ]
Martelaro, Nikolas [2 ]
Hinds, Pamela J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'15) | 2015年
关键词
Human-robot teamwork; emotion regulation; repair; team performance; group problem solving; conflict; EMOTION REGULATION; INTRAGROUP CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1145/2696454.2696460
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We explore whether robots can positively influence conflict dynamics by repairing interpersonal violations that occur during a team-based problem-solving task. In a 2 (negative trigger: task-directed vs. personal attack) x 2 (repair: yes vs. no) between-subjects experiment (N = 57 teams, 114 participants), we studied the effect of a robot intervention on affect, perceptions of conflict, perceptions of team members' contributions, and team performance during a problem-solving task. Specifically, the robot either intervened by repairing a task-directed or personal attack by a confederate or did not intervene. Contrary to our expectations, we found that the robot's repair interventions increased the groups' awareness of conflict after the occurrence of a personal attack thereby acting against the groups' tendency to suppress the conflict. These findings suggest that repair heightened awareness of a normative violation. Overall, our results provide support for the idea that robots can aid team functioning by regulating core team processes such as conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace [J].
Andersson, LM ;
Pearson, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :452-471
[2]   The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior [J].
Barsade, SG .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (04) :644-675
[3]   Why does affect matter in organizations? [J].
Barsade, Sigal G. ;
Gibson, Donald E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) :36-59
[4]  
Bartneck C., 2007, 2007 2nd Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), P217, DOI 10.1145/1228716.1228746
[5]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[6]   Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork [J].
Breazeal, C ;
Kidd, CD ;
Thomaz, AL ;
Hoffman, G ;
Berlin, M .
2005 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2005, :383-388
[7]  
De Dreu C.K.W., 1997, USING CONFLICT ORG, P9, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781446217016.N1, DOI 10.4135/9781446217016.N2]
[8]   Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis [J].
De Dreu, CKW ;
Weingart, LR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (04) :741-749
[9]   The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Wit, Frank R. C. ;
Greer, Lindred L. ;
Jehn, Karen A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (02) :360-390
[10]   CONFLICTS - PRODUCTIVE AND DESTRUCTIVE [J].
DEUTSCH, M .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1969, 25 (01) :7-41