Immediate and delayed loading of two-piece reduced-diameter implants with locator-analog attachments in edentulous mandibles: One-year results from a randomized clinical trial examining clinical outcome and patient expectation

被引:16
作者
Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas [1 ]
Ariaans, Kirsten [2 ]
Eberhard, Lydia [2 ]
Klotz, Anna-Luisa [2 ]
Oh, Keunyoung [2 ]
Kappel, Stefanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Prosthodont, Pleicherwall 2, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Prosthodont, INF 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
edentulous mandible; immediate loading; implant survival; Locator((R)); overdentures; patient expectation; reduced-diameter; 2-piece implants; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; SATISFACTION; DENTURES; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS; PROSTHESES; PROTOCOLS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12489
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundProsthetic management of thin alveolar ridges in the edentulous mandibles of elderly patients, especially the time of loading, the number of implants needed, and patient expectations and perception, is a challenge in implant dentistry. PurposeSurvival of conventionally and immediately loaded 2-piece reduced-diameter implants in the interforaminal region of the edentulous mandible supporting locator-analog attachments was evaluated. Prosthetic complications and peri-implant hygiene were also studied, and patient expectation and subjective evaluation of the treatment were documented. Material and MethodsTwenty-five patients with adapted complete dentures received 4 reduced-diameter implants. All anterior implants were immediately loaded. Three months later, patients were allocated by randomization to 1 of 2 treatment groups: 2 locator-analog attachments on the anterior implants (Group A); or 4 locator-analog attachments (Group B). After another 3 months patient allocation was changed (crossover design) for the next 3 months. Questionnaires with Likert scales and numeric rating scales were used to assess patients' expectations and subjective overdenture-related variables, respectively. ResultsOne implant was lost in the immediate-loading group. Survival was 98% and 100% for immediate and delayed loading, respectively. During 12-month observation, 8 complications required aftercare. At the beginning of treatment, patients' expectations were highly positive. Subjective assessment of overdenture-related variables 3 months after immediate loading of 2 implants revealed a statistically significant improvement for most of the variables studied; this was maintained 1 year later. In the subjective assessments, there were no statistically significant differences between Groups A and B. ConclusionImmediate loading of reduced-diameter implants supporting locator-analog attachments resulted in high implant survival, few prosthetic complications, good oral hygiene, and improvement of subjective denture perception in the short-term. It might be a promising treatment option, especially for elderly patients with a narrow mandibular ridge.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 653
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]  
Schimmel Martin, 2015, Swiss Dent J, V125, P449
[32]   Marginal Bone Response Around Immediate- and Delayed-Loading Implants Supporting a Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Randomized Controlled Study [J].
Schincaglia, Gian Pietro ;
Rubin, Satoko ;
Thacker, Sejal ;
Dhingra, Ajay ;
Trombelli, Leonardo ;
Ioannidou, Efie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (02) :448-458
[33]   Loading protocols and implant supported restorations proposed for the rehabilitation of partially and fully edentulous jaws. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report [J].
Schwarz, Frank ;
Sanz-Martin, Ignacio ;
Kern, Jaana-Sophia ;
Taylor, Thomas ;
Schaer, Alex ;
Wolfart, Stefan ;
Sanz, Mariano .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (08) :988-992
[34]   Early loading of implants with fixed dental prostheses in edentulous mandibles: 4.5-year clinical results from a prospective study [J].
Schwarz, Stefanie ;
Gabbert, Olaf ;
Hassel, Alexander J. ;
Schmitter, Marc ;
Seche, Christiane ;
Rammelsberg, Peter .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (03) :284-289
[35]  
Sennerby L, 1998, INT J PROSTHODONT, V11, P408
[36]  
Stellingsma K, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P563
[37]  
Stricker A, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P868
[38]   Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients - the York Consensus Statement [J].
Thomason, J. Mark ;
Feine, Jocelyne ;
Exley, Catherine ;
Moynihan, Paula ;
Mueller, Frauke ;
Naert, Ignace ;
Ellis, Janice S. ;
Barclay, Craig ;
Butterworth, Chris ;
Scott, Brendan ;
Lynch, Christopher ;
Stewardson, Dominic ;
Smith, Philip ;
Welfare, Richard ;
Hyde, Paul ;
McAndrew, Robert ;
Fenlon, Michael ;
Barclay, Stewart ;
Barker, Dean .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2009, 207 (04) :185-186
[39]  
vansWaas M. A., 1990, J PROSTHET DENT, V63, P545
[40]  
Walton JN, 2009, INT J PROSTHODONT, V22, P331