Who? What? Event Tracking Needs Event Understanding

被引:2
作者
Mamo, Nicholas [1 ]
Azzopardi, Joel [1 ]
Layfield, Colin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malta, Fac ICT, Msida, Malta
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KDIR), VOL 1: | 2021年
关键词
Twitter; Topic Detection and Tracking; Information Retrieval; Event Modelling and Mining; FRAMEWORK; SEMANTICS;
D O I
10.5220/0010650500003064
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Humans first learn, then think and finally perform a task. Machines neither learn nor think, but we still expect them to perform tasks as well as humans. In this position paper, we address the lack of understanding in Topic Detection and Tracking (TDT), an area that builds timelines of events, but which hardly understands events at all. Without understanding events, TDT has progressed slowly as the community struggles to solve the challenges of modern data sources, like Twitter. We explore understanding from different perspectives: what it means for machines to understand events, why TDT needs understanding, and how algorithms can generate knowledge automatically. To generate understanding, we settle on a structured definition of events based on the four Ws: the Who, What, Where and When. Of the four Ws, we focus especially on the Who and the What, aligning them with other research areas that can help TDT generate event knowledge automatically. In time, understanding can lead to machines that not only track events better, but also model and mine them.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allan J., 1998, Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P37, DOI 10.1145/290941.290954
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P 5 WORKSH MAK SENS
[3]   Methods for automatic term recognition in domain-specific text collections: A survey [J].
Astrakhantsev, N. A. ;
Fedorenko, D. G. ;
Turdakov, D. Yu. .
PROGRAMMING AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, 2015, 41 (06) :336-349
[4]   A SURVEY OF TECHNIQUES FOR EVENT DETECTION IN TWITTER [J].
Atefeh, Farzindar ;
Khreich, Wael .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 31 (01) :132-164
[5]   Making sense of social media streams through semantics: A survey [J].
Bontcheva, Kalina ;
Rout, Dominic .
SEMANTIC WEB, 2014, 5 (05) :373-403
[6]  
Buntain Cody, 2016, 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), P366, DOI 10.1109/CCNC.2016.7444808
[7]   Event modeling and mining: a long journey toward explainable events [J].
Chen, Xinhong ;
Li, Qing .
VLDB JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (01) :459-482
[8]   Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Tweet Mining for Event Detection: A Case Study of Hurricane Florence [J].
Farnaghi, Mahdi ;
Ghaemi, Zeinab ;
Mansourian, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (03) :378-393
[9]  
Fung G.P. C., 2005, VLDB, P181
[10]   Real-time event detection from the Twitter data stream using the TwitterNews plus Framework [J].
Hasan, Mahmud ;
Orgun, Mehmet A. ;
Schwitter, Rolf .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (03) :1146-1165