Bioethical Dialogue as a Method of Scientific Research Management

被引:0
作者
Mescheryakova, Tamara V. [1 ]
Gerasimova, Olga V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tomsk State Pedag Univ, Tomsk, Russia
来源
VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017 | 2017年
关键词
bioethics; dialogue; scientific research; sociology; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; ETHICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Nuremberg Code, which by rights can be called the first bioethical document, was the first case of ethical solution for legal problems. It emerged as a result of dialogue between lawyers and doctors and became the prototype of all modern ethical and legal guidelines in the field of biomedical research, and dialogue itself became the symbol of bioethics. Bioethics, both in theory and in practice, deals with self developing open systems (sciences, social practices), so the dialogue space of bioethics becomes much broader. It is becoming wider not only due to involvement of new actors in the dialogue, but also due to emergence of new content areas in the already existing interactions of bioethics with other scientific disciplines. Which new types of dialogue have emerged in recent decades? How does the dialogue between bioethics and other sciences develop? The search for an answer to these questions is relevant both for determining the role of bioethics in regulating scientific research and for clarifying the limits of bioethics itself. The purpose of this work is to discover the ways in which bioethics can influence scientific research through establishing of bioethical dialogue. For this purpose, the primary types and forms of dialogue initiated directly by bioethics are revealed, and the role of bioethics in interdisciplinary dialogue is clarified by the example of its interaction with law and sociology.
引用
收藏
页码:4262 / 4269
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A dialogue between virtue ethics and care ethics
    Benner, P
    [J]. THEORETICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 18 (1-2) : 47 - 61
  • [2] The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics
    Borry, P
    Schotsmans, P
    Dierickx, K
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2005, 19 (01) : 49 - 71
  • [3] Borry P., 2004, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, V7, P1
  • [4] Bioethicists Can and Should Contribute to Addressing Racism
    Danis, Marion
    Wilson, Yolonda
    White, Amina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2016, 16 (04) : 3 - 12
  • [5] De Vries R. G., 2007, CLIN ETHICS, V2, P33
  • [6] Social science and bioethics: the way forward
    de Vries, Raymond
    Turner, Leigh
    Orfali, Kristina
    Bosk, Charles
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2006, 28 (06) : 665 - 677
  • [7] Dorner K, 2003, GUTE ARZT LEHRBUCH A
  • [8] Dove E. S., 2017, CLIN ETHICS
  • [9] Evdokimov KE, 2016, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION EXCELLENCE VISION 2020: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOLS I - VI, P355
  • [10] SYMBIOTIC EMPIRICAL ETHICS: A PRACTICAL METHODOLOGY
    Frith, Lucy
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2012, 26 (04) : 198 - 206