Error-Induced Blindness: Error Detection Leads to Impaired Sensory Processing and Lower Accuracy at Short Response-Stimulus Intervals

被引:61
作者
Buzzell, George A. [1 ]
Beatty, Paul J. [1 ]
Paquette, Natalie A. [1 ]
Roberts, Daniel M. [1 ]
McDonald, Craig G. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
attention; ERN; error; Pe; post-error accuracy; post-error slowing; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; GAIN-CONTROL; ADJUSTMENTS; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-16.2017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Empirical evidence indicates that detecting one's own mistakes can serve as a signal to improve task performance. However, little work has focused on how task constraints, such as the response-stimulus interval (RSI), influence post-error adjustments. In the present study, event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral measures were used to investigate the time course of error-related processing while humans performed a difficult visual discrimination task. We found that error commission resulted in a marked reduction in both task performance and sensory processing on the following trial when RSIs were short, but that such impairments were not detectable at longer RSIs. Critically, diminished sensory processing at short RSIs, indexed by the stimulus-evoked P1 component, was predicted by an ERP measure of error processing, the Pe component. A control analysis ruled out a general lapse in attention or mind wandering as being predictive of subsequent reductions in sensory processing; instead, the data suggest that error detection causes an attentional bottleneck, which can diminish sensory processing on subsequent trials that occur in short succession. The findings demonstrate that the neural system dedicated to monitoring and improving behavior can, paradoxically, at times be the source of performance failures.
引用
收藏
页码:2895 / 2903
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[2]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[3]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[4]   Post-error adjustments [J].
Danielmeier, Claudia ;
Ullsperger, Markus .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[5]   Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex Activity Predicts Post-Error Adaptations in Task-Related Visual and Motor Areas [J].
Danielmeier, Claudia ;
Eichele, Tom ;
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Tittgemeyer, Marc ;
Ullsperger, Markus .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (05) :1780-1789
[6]   The role of working memory in visual selective attention [J].
de Fockert, JW ;
Rees, G ;
Frith, CD ;
Lavie, N .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5509) :1803-1806
[7]  
Debener S., 2010, Simultaneous EEG and FMRI: Recording, Analysis, and Application, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195372731.003.0008
[8]   EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[9]   Testing theories of post-error slowing [J].
Dutilh, Gilles ;
Vandekerckhove, Joachim ;
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (02) :454-465
[10]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149