Landscape Preferences of Visitors to the Danube Floodplains National Park, Vienna

被引:19
作者
Arnberger, Arne [1 ]
Eder, Renate [1 ]
Preiner, Stefan [2 ,3 ]
Hein, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Nopp-Mayr, Ursula [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Landscape Dev Recreat & Conservat Planning, Peter Jordan Str 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Hydrobiol & Aquat Ecosyst Management, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] AG BIGER, Wasser Cluster Lunzbiol Stn, Dr Carl Kupelwieser Prom 5, A-3293 Lunz, Austria
[4] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Wildlife Biol & Game Management, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
aesthetics; blue spaces; discrete choice experiment; ecosystem services; human benefits; visitor management; TRADE-OFFS; URBAN; RESTORATION; RECREATION; RIVER; HETEROGENEITY; ATTACHMENT; CHALLENGES; BEHAVIOR; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/w13162178
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Successfully managing heavily visited protected riverscapes requires information about visitor preferences for the social, biophysical and infrastructural attributes of river landscapes. This study analyzed the landscape preferences of 520 on-site visitors to the peri-urban Danube Floodplains National Park using an image-based discrete choice experiment. The study explored the effects of various landscape types (water bodies, terrestrial landscapes), recreational infrastructures (trail types, facilities) and trail use conditions (trail user numbers, activities) on respondents' preferences. The results indicated that natural features, such as floodplain forests in combination with meadows or xeric alluvial biotopes, were preferred, while dense forests and, particularly, open agrarian structures were less preferred. Water bodies with 50% reed cover, few people on the trail, alleys of trees and gravel trails were favored. The outcomes serve as the basis for design recommendations for planned recreational areas surrounding the national park with the aim of absorbing visitors and reducing use pressure on the protected area.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Arnberger A., 2009, OKOLOGISCHE SOZIALE, V135
[2]  
Arnberger Arne, 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V4, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
[3]   Trade-offs between wind energy, recreational, and bark-beetle impacts on visual preferences of national park visitors [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate ;
Allex, Brigitte ;
Preisel, Hemma ;
Ebenberger, Martin ;
Husslein, Maria .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 76 :166-177
[4]   Are urban visitors' general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief? [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2015, 14 (04) :872-882
[5]   The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2012, 11 (01) :41-49
[6]   Exploring the Heterogeneity of Cultural Landscape Preferences: A Visual-Based Latent Class Approach [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate .
LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (01) :19-40
[7]   How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Aikoh, Tetsuya ;
Eder, Renate ;
Shoji, Yasushi ;
Mieno, Taro .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2010, 9 (03) :215-225
[8]   Prediction of potential macrophyte development in response to restoration measures in an urban riverine wetland [J].
Baart, Iris ;
Gschoepf, Christine ;
Blaschke, Alfred Paul ;
Preiner, Stefan ;
Hein, Thomas .
AQUATIC BOTANY, 2010, 93 (03) :153-162
[9]   Willingness to travel to avoid recreation conflicts in Danish forests [J].
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh ;
Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ;
Jensen, Frank Sondergaard .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2014, 13 (04) :662-671
[10]   Social Carrying Capacity Challenges in Parks, Forests, and Protected Areas An Examination of Transatlantic Methodologies and Practices [J].
Burns, Robert C. ;
Arnberger, Arne ;
Von Ruschkowski, Eick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) :30-50