Modelling the Food Availability and Environmental Impacts of a Shift Towards Consumption of Healthy Dietary Patterns in Australia

被引:19
作者
Candy, Seona [1 ]
Turner, Graham [2 ]
Larsen, Kirsten [2 ]
Wingrove, Kate [3 ]
Steenkamp, Julia [4 ]
Friel, Sharon [5 ]
Lawrence, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Urban & Reg Studies Urbaria, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, IPAN, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Fac Agr & Vet Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance RegNet, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
healthy and sustainable diets; nutrition; environment; food security; agriculture; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; SUSTAINABLE DIETS; SECURITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; AGRICULTURE; CHALLENGE; SYSTEMS; COSTS; ERA;
D O I
10.3390/su11247124
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dietary change has been suggested as a key strategy to maintain food security, improve health and reduce environmental impacts in the face of rising populations, resource scarcity and climate change impacts, particularly in developed countries. This paper presents findings from a quantitative modelling analysis of food availability and environmental implications of shifting the current average Australian dietary pattern to one of two alternative, healthy dietary patterns, the 'healthy mixed diet', with a mixture of animal and plant foods, and the 'healthy plant-based diet', with only plant foods. Both were constructed in accordance with the Australian Dietary Guideline recommendations, and four sustainability principles: Avoiding over-consumption, reducing intake of discretionary foods, reducing animal products, and reducing food waste. It was assumed that all food was provided domestically where possible, and export of foods only occurred when there was a surplus to domestic requirements. The authors compared the impacts of each dietary pattern on direct food availability, water use, land use, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel and energy use and fertiliser use. The plant-based diet had the best overall environmental and direct food availability outcomes, however had key vulnerabilities in terms of fertiliser and cropping land availability. For the agricultural sector overall, changes in diet had little effect on environmental impact due to the amount and nature of Australian exports, indicating that changes to production methods are also necessary. Likewise, changing diets had little effect on the existing environmentally intensive Australian economy, indicating that changes to other sectors are also necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review [J].
Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz ;
Green, Rosemary ;
Joy, Edward J. M. ;
Smith, Pete ;
Haines, Andy .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 2 INT C NUTR FRAM AC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Australia and Food security in a changing world: Can we feed ourselves and help feed the world in the future?
[4]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR FOOD STAT 2012
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Synthesis Report: A Synthesis of the Global and Sub-Global IAASTD Reports
[6]   What Current Literature Tells Us about Sustainable Diets: Emerging Research Linking Dietary Patterns, Environmental Sustainability, and Economics [J].
Auestad, Nancy ;
Fulgoni, Victor L., III .
ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2015, 6 (01) :19-36
[7]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2014, AUSTR HLTH SURV NUTR
[8]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2012, AUSTR FOOD NUTR
[9]   Linking sustainability to the healthy eating patterns of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a modelling study [J].
Blackstone, Nicole Tichenor ;
El-Abbadi, Naglaa H. ;
McCabe, Margaret S. ;
Griffin, Timothy S. ;
Nelson, Miriam E. .
LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2018, 2 (08) :E344-E352
[10]  
DAFF, 2013, NAT FOOD PLAN OUR FU