A life cycle approach to optimizing carbon footprint and costs of a residential building

被引:78
作者
Pal, Sudip Kumar [1 ]
Takano, Atsushi [2 ]
Alanne, Kari [1 ]
Siren, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, POB 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
[2] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Architecture & Architectural Engn, Kagoshima, Japan
关键词
Buildings; Life cycle optimization; Carbon footprint; Embodied carbon; Life cycle cost; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EMBODIED ENERGY; MATERIAL SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; HOUSE; REFURBISHMENT; MINIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; FINLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.051
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Finding life cycle optimized building designs is a challenging task. It requires the inclusion of all phases of the building life cycle in a single optimization problem. The present study demonstrates a life cycle simulation-based optimization approach, by including the operational carbon footprint (OCF) and embodied carbon footprint (ECF) of a building. Particularly, finding and analyzing the difference between life cycle (OCF + ECF) optimized design and operational (only OCF) performance-based optimized design is the primary goal of the current study. The life cycle optimization method is applied to a townhouse in Finland to determine carbon-cost optimal designs. Different options of building envelope insulation thicknesses, window types, heating systems, heat recovery units, and PV area are explored as design variables. It has been found that the heating system is a dominant design variable, which results in clearly separated pareto fronts for each system. Generally, a majority of the design variables' optimal values, obtained from OCF + ECF optimization, suggest thinner insulation for the building envelope and a larger PV area, compared to the optimal solutions from OCF optimization. In a carbon optimal solution, the share of ECF is 39% of the life cycle carbon footprint, whereas in a cost optimal solution, the share of ECF is 28% of the life cycle carbon footprint. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 162
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Adalberth K., 2001, INT J LOW ENERGY SUS, V2
[2]  
Ahola J, 2015, NATL SURVEY REPORT P
[3]   Techno-economic assessment and optimization of Stirling engine micro-cogeneration systems in residential buildings [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Soderholm, Niklas ;
Siren, Kai ;
Beausoleil-Morrison, Ian .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 51 (12) :2635-2646
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 13791 EN ISO BSI
[5]  
[Anonymous], BUILDINGS
[6]  
[Anonymous], BUILD GREEN FUT POL
[7]  
[Anonymous], P INT C INT SYST STR
[8]   A new methodology for cost-optimal analysis by means of the multi-objective optimization of building energy performance [J].
Ascione, Fabrizio ;
Bianco, Nicola ;
De Stasio, Claudio ;
Mauro, Gerardo Maria ;
Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 88 :78-90
[9]   Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldassarri, Catia ;
Fthenakis, Vasilis .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 64 :73-89
[10]   Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland [J].
Asif, M. ;
Muneer, T. ;
Kelley, R. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (03) :1391-1394