A canonical discriminant analysis to study the association between milk fatty acids of ruminal origin and milk fat depression in dairy cows

被引:32
|
作者
Conte, G. [1 ]
Dimauro, C. [2 ]
Serra, A. [1 ]
Macciotta, N. P. P. [2 ]
Mele, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Agr Food & Environm, Via Borghetto 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Dept Agr, Via Nicola 9, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
milk fat depression; cow; biohydrogenation; discriminant analysis; CONJUGATED LINOLEIC-ACID; MULTIVARIATE FACTOR-ANALYSIS; FORAGE-CONCENTRATE RATIO; STEAROYL-COA DESATURASE; GOATS FED DIETS; FISH-OIL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; LACTATING COWS; PLANT OILS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13941
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although milk fat depression (MFD) has been observed and described since the beginning of the last century, all the molecular and biochemical mechanisms involved are still not completely understood. Some fatty acids (FA) originating during rumen biohydrogenation have been proposed as causative elements of MFD. However, contradictory results were obtained when studying the effect of single FA on MFD. An alternative could be the simultaneous evaluation of the effect of many FA using a multivariate approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between individual milk FA of ruminal origin and MFD using canonical discriminant analysis, a multivariate technique able to distinguish 2 or more groups on the basis of a pool of variables. In a commercial dairy herd, a diet containing 26% starch on a DM basis induced an unintentional MFD syndrome in 14 cows out of 40. Milk yielded by these 14 animals showed a fat content lower than 50% of the ordinary value, whereas milk production and protein content were normal. The remaining 26 cows secreted typical milk fat content and therefore were considered the control group, even though they ate the same diet. The stepwise discriminant analysis selected 14 milk FA of ruminal origin most able to distinguish the 2 groups. This restricted pool of FA was used, as variables, in a run of the canonical discriminant analysis that was able to significantly discriminate between the 2 groups. Out of the 14 FA, 5 conjugated linoleic acid isomers (C18:2 trans-10,trans-12, C18:2 trans-8,trans-10, C18:2 trans-11,cis-13, C18:2 cis-9,cis-11, C18:2 cis-10,cis-12) and C15:0 iso were more related to the control group, whereas C18:2 trans-10,cis-12, C16:1 trans-6-7, C16:1 trans-9, C18:1 trans-6-8, C18:1 trans-9, C18:1 trans-10, C18:1 cis-11, and C18:3n-3 were positively associated with the MFD group, allowing a complete discrimination. On the basis of these results, we can conclude that ( 1) the shift of ruminal biohydrogenation from C18:1 trans-11. to C18:1 trans-10 seemed to be strongly associated with MFD; (2) at the same time, other C18:1 trans isomers showed a similar association; (3) on the contrary, conjugated linoleic acid isomers other than C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 seemed to be associated with a normal fat secretion. Results confirmed that MFD is the consequence of a combined effect of the outflow of many ruminal FA, which collectively affect mammary fat synthesis. Because the animals of the 2 groups were fed the same diet, these results suggested that factors other than diet are involved in the MFD syndrome. Feeding behavior (i.e., ability to select dietary ingredients in a total mixed ration), rumen environment and the composition of ruminal bacteria are additional factors able to modify the products of rumen biohydrogenation. Results of the present work confirmed that the multivariate approach can be a useful tool to evaluate a metabolic pathway that involves several parameters, providing interesting suggestions about the role of some FA involved in MFD. However, results about the MFD syndrome obtained in the present research require a deep molecular investigation to be confirmed.
引用
收藏
页码:6497 / 6510
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of antioxidant supplementation on milk production, milk fat synthesis, and milk fatty acids in dairy cows when fed a diet designed to cause milk fat depression
    Boerman, J. P.
    Preseault, C. L.
    Kraft, J.
    Dann, H. M.
    Lock, A. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (02) : 1077 - 1081
  • [2] CAUSES OF MILK FAT DEPRESSION IN DAIRY COWS
    Alatas, Mustafa Selcuk
    Citil, O. Baris
    Kahraman, Oguzhan
    Ozbilgin, Abdullah
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES D-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 58 : 80 - 85
  • [3] Effects of Biotin Supplementation on Milk Production, Milk Composition, Milk Fatty Acids, Ruminal pH, Ammonia Nitrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids in Lactating Dairy Cows
    Suksombat, W.
    Lounglawan, P.
    Paengsai, P.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2011, 10 (16): : 2186 - 2192
  • [4] THE FATTY ACIDS AND GLYCERIDES OF COWS MILK FAT
    JACK, EL
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1960, 8 (05) : 377 - 380
  • [5] Distribution of hypercholesterolemic fatty acids and atherogenic index in the milk fat of dairy cows
    Pesek, M.
    Samkova, E.
    Spicka, J.
    Pelikanova, T.
    MILCHWISSENSCHAFT-MILK SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 64 (02): : 154 - 157
  • [6] Trans-octadecenoic acids and milk fat depression in lactating dairy cows
    Griinari, JM
    Dwyer, DA
    McGuire, MA
    Bauman, DE
    Palmquist, DL
    Nurmela, KVV
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1998, 81 (05) : 1251 - 1261
  • [7] Total and Free Fatty Acids Analysis in Milk and Dairy Fat
    Amores, Gustavo
    Virto, Mailo
    SEPARATIONS, 2019, 6 (01)
  • [8] Effect of silage botanical composition on ruminal biohydrogenation and transfer of fatty acids to milk in dairy cows
    Adler, S. A.
    Jensen, S. K.
    Thuen, E.
    Gustavsson, A. -M.
    Harstad, O. M.
    Steinshamn, H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (02) : 1135 - 1147
  • [9] ORIGIN OF GLYCERIDE FATTY ACIDS OF MILK FAT
    GERSON, T
    WILSON, GF
    SINGH, H
    SHORLAND, FB
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1966, 49 (06) : 680 - &
  • [10] Trans fatty acids and their role in the milk of dairy cows
    Vargas-Bello-Perez, Einar
    Garnsworthy, Phil C.
    CIENCIA E INVESTIGACION AGRARIA, 2013, 40 (03): : 449 - 473