Nonfatal Gun Use in Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:65
作者
Sorenson, Susan B. [1 ]
Schut, Rebecca A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Social Policy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, 3815 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
coercive control; domestic violence; firearms; guns; intimate partner violence; policy; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; RISK-FACTORS; COUPLE VIOLENCE; HOMICIDE; WOMEN; FIREARMS; PREDICTORS; CALIFORNIA; TERRORISM; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1177/1524838016668589
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Guns figure prominently in the homicide of women by an intimate partner. Less is known, however, about their nonfatal use against an intimate partner. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched eight electronic databases and identified 10 original research articles that reported the prevalence of the nonfatal use of firearms against an intimate partner. Results indicate that (1) there is relatively little research on the subject of intimate partners' nonfatal gun use against women. (2) The number of U.S. women alive today who have had an intimate partner use a gun against them is substantial: About 4.5 million have had an intimate partner threaten them with a gun and nearly 1 million have been shot or shot at by an intimate partner. Whether nonfatal gun use is limited to the extreme form of abuse (battering) or whether it occurs in the context of situational violence remains to be seen. Regardless, when it comes to the likely psychological impact, it may be a distinction without a difference; because guns can be lethal quickly and with relatively little effort, displaying or threatening with a gun can create a context known as coercive control, which facilitates chronic and escalating abuse. Implications for policy, practice, and research are discussed, all of which include expanding an implicit focus on homicide to include an intimate partner's nonfatal use of a gun.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 442
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Risk factors for violent death of women in the home [J].
Bailey, JE ;
Kellermann, AL ;
Somes, GW ;
Banton, JG ;
Rivara, FP ;
Rushforth, NP .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (07) :777-782
[12]   Research Synthesis [J].
Baker, Reg ;
Blumberg, Stephen J. ;
Brick, J. Michael ;
Couper, Mick P. ;
Courtright, Melanie ;
Dennis, J. Michael ;
Dillman, Don ;
Frankel, Martin R. ;
Garland, Philip ;
Groves, Robert M. ;
Kennedy, Courtney ;
Krosnick, Jon ;
Lavrakas, Paul J. ;
Lee, Sunghee ;
Link, Michael ;
Piekarski, Linda ;
Rao, Kumar ;
Thomas, Randall K. ;
Zahs, Dan .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2010, 74 (04) :711-781
[13]  
BERRIOS DC, 1991, WESTERN J MED, V155, P133
[14]   Public Opinion Regarding Whether Speaking With Patients About Firearms Is Appropriate Results of a National Survey [J].
Betz, Marian E. ;
Azrael, Deborah ;
Barber, Catherine ;
Miller, Matthew .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (08) :543-+
[15]  
Bridges F.S., 2008, Criminal Justice Policy Review, V19, P117, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0887403407309038, 10.1177/0887403407309038]
[16]   Intimate partner homicide - Review and implications of research and policy [J].
Campbell, Jacquelyn C. ;
Glass, Nancy ;
Sharps, Phyllis W. ;
Laughon, Kathryn ;
Bloom, Tina .
TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2007, 8 (03) :246-269
[17]   Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study [J].
Campbell, JC ;
Webster, D ;
Koziol-McLain, J ;
Block, C ;
Campbell, D ;
Curry, MA ;
Gary, F ;
Glass, N ;
McFarlane, J ;
Sachs, C ;
Sharps, P ;
Ulrich, Y ;
Wilt, SA ;
Manganello, J ;
Xu, X ;
Schollenberger, J ;
Frye, V ;
Laughon, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (07) :1089-1097
[18]  
Cooper A., 2011, 236018 NCJ US DEP JU
[19]  
Dugan L., 2003, Criminology Public Policy, V2, P283, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2003.TB00126.X
[20]   Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization [J].
Dutton, MA ;
Goodman, LA .
SEX ROLES, 2005, 52 (11-12) :743-756