Carotid Artery Stenting: Single-Center Experience Over 11 Years

被引:12
作者
Nolz, Richard [1 ]
Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert [1 ]
Cejna, Manfred [2 ]
Schernthaner, Melanie [1 ]
Lammer, Johannes [1 ]
Schoder, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] LKH Feldkirch, Dept Radiol, A-6800 Feldkirch, Austria
关键词
Carotid artery stenting; Stroke; Spasm; Learning curve; In-stent-restenosis; LEARNING-CURVE; PROTECTION DEVICES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VELOCITY CRITERIA; CONTRAST-MEDIA; RISK PATIENTS; ENDARTERECTOMY; ANGIOPLASTY; STENOSIS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-009-9673-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This article reports the results of carotid artery stenting during an 11-year period. Data from 168 carotid artery stenting procedures (symptomatic, n = 55; asymptomatic, n = 101; symptoms not accessible, n = 12) were retrospectively collected. Primary technical success rate, neurological events in-hospital, access-site complications, and contrast-induced nephropathy (n = 118) were evaluated. To evaluate the influence of experience in carotid artery stenting on intraprocedural neurologic complications, patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the first 80 treated patients, and group 2 the remainder of the patients (n = 88). In-stent restenoses at last-follow-up examinations (n = 89) were assessed. The overall primary technical success rate was 95.8%. The in-hospital stroke-death rate was 3.0% (n = 5; symptomatic, 5.4%; asymptomatic, 2.0%; p = 0.346). Neurologic complications were markedly higher in group 1 (4.2%; three major strokes; symptomatic, 2.8%, asymptomatic, 1.4%) compared to group 2 (2.4%; one major and one minor stroke-symptomatic, 1.2%, asymptomatic 1.2%), but this was not statistically significant. Further complications were access-site complications in 12 (7.1%), with surgical revision required in 1 (0.6%) and mild contrast-induced nephropathy in 1 (0.85%). Twenty-one (23.6%) patients had > 50% in-stent restenosis during a mean follow-up of 28.2 months. In conclusion, advanced experience in carotid artery stenting leads to an acceptable periprocedural stroke-death rate. In-stent restenosis could be a critical factor during the follow-up course.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis [J].
AbuRahma, Ali F. ;
Maxwell, Damian ;
Eads, Kris ;
Flaherty, Sarah K. ;
Stutler, Tabitha .
VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (03) :119-125
[2]  
Ahmadi R, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P539, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0539:CASEOL>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. [J].
Aspelin, P ;
Aubry, P ;
Fransson, S ;
Strasser, R ;
Willenbrock, R ;
Berg, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (06) :491-499
[5]   Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis [J].
Barnett, HJM ;
Taylor, W ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Ferguson, GG ;
Haynes, RB ;
Rankin, RN ;
Clagett, GP ;
Hachinski, VC ;
Sackett, DL ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Meldrum, HE ;
Spence, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1415-1425
[6]   Lessons from EVA-3S and SPACE [J].
Beckett, David ;
Gaines, Peter A. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (01) :5-7
[7]  
Biller J, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P501
[8]  
Bosiers M, 2005, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V46, P241
[9]   Clinical outcomes of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study to analyze the effect of hydration and acetylcysteine [J].
Chen, Shao Liang ;
Zhang, Junjie ;
Yei, Fei ;
Zhu, Zhongsheng ;
Liu, Zhizhong ;
Lin, Song ;
Chu, Jun ;
Yan, Ji ;
Zhang, Ruiyan ;
Kwan, Tak W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 126 (03) :407-413
[10]   Restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a follow-up study with duplex ultrasonography [J].
Christiaans, MH ;
Ernst, JMPG ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
van den Berg, JC ;
Overtoom, TTC ;
Kelder, JC ;
Mauser, HW ;
Ackerstaff, RGA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (02) :141-144