Vaccine Development for Urinary Tract Infections: Where Do We Stand?

被引:21
|
作者
Magistro, Giuseppe [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, Marchioninistr 17, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2019年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Antimicrobial resistance; Urinary tract infection; Vaccine; PROPHYLAXIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections. Its management has become increasingly challenging due to antimicrobial resistance. The four mainstays to tackle this crisis rely on the development of new antibiotic agents, the introduction of preventive and alternative antimicrobial strategies, the concept of antimicrobial stewardship, and effective hygiene measures. One of the most effective approaches to prevent UTIs is the design of a potent vaccine. OM-89 is a lyophilised preparation of membrane proteins from 18 different uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. The safety and efficacy of this immunoactive agent is well documented; therefore, it is recommended for the prophylaxis of UTI according to the current European Association of Urology guidelines on urological infections. In terms of a true vaccine designed to target specifically pathogenic bacteria, no substance is currently available. ExPEC4V, a novel tetravalent bioconjugate vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli, was evaluated for safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy in a randomised, single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. The vaccine was well tolerated and elicited a robust antibody response in patients suffering from recurrent UTIs. Although the first clinical data suggested a reduced incidence of UTIs after vaccination, especially for higher bacterial loads, further randomised controlled trials are necessary to determine its true clinical benefit. (c) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 41
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimizing factor prophylaxis for the haemophilia population: where do we stand?
    Blanchette, VS
    Manco-Johnson, M
    Santagostino, E
    Ljung, R
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2004, 10 : 97 - 104
  • [42] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists: where do we stand?
    Nawroth, Frank
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2019, 17 (02): : 83 - 86
  • [43] Enterococcus faecalis urinary-tract infections: Do they have a zoonotic origin?
    Abat, Cedric
    Huart, Michael
    Garcia, Vincent
    Dubourg, Gregory
    Raoult, Didier
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2016, 73 (04) : 305 - 313
  • [44] Can the composition of the intestinal microbiota predict the development of urinary tract infections?
    den Heijer, Casper D. J.
    Geerlings, Suzanne E.
    Prins, Jan M.
    Beerepoot, Marielle A. J.
    Stobberingh, Ellen E.
    Penders, John
    FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 11 (11) : 1394 - 1403
  • [45] Applying proteomics to tick vaccine development: where are we?
    Villar, Margarita
    Marina, Anabel
    de la Fuente, Jose
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS, 2017, 14 (03) : 211 - 221
  • [46] Recurrence of urinary tract infections and development of urinary-specific antibiogram for kidney transplant recipients
    Korayem, Ghazwa B.
    Zangeneh, Tirdad T.
    Matthias, Kathryn R.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2018, 12 : 119 - 123
  • [47] Deciphering Vaccines for COVID-19: where do we stand today?
    Baviskar, Tushar
    Raut, Dezaree
    Bhatt, Lokesh Kumar
    IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY, 2021, 43 (01) : 8 - 21
  • [48] Monitoring Bone Health in Children with Hemophilic Arthropathy: Where Do We Stand?
    Goyal, Alpesh
    Khadgawat, Rajesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 86 (06) : 487 - 488
  • [49] Preventing sepsis development in complicated urinary tract infections
    Petrosillo, Nicola
    Granata, Guido
    Boyle, Breida
    Doyle, Maeve M.
    Pinchera, Biagio
    Taglietti, Fabrizio
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2020, 18 (01) : 47 - 61
  • [50] Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
    Polat, Mehtap
    Mumusoglu, Sezcan
    Yarali Ozbek, Irem
    Bozdag, Gurkan
    Yarali, Hakan
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 15