Does globalization reduce child labor?

被引:14
作者
Kis-Katos, Krisztina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Econ Res, Dept Int Econ, D-7800 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
child labor; international trade; income distribution;
D O I
10.1080/09638190601165558
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers the effects of trade liberalization on child labor that arises out of subsistence needs. It argues that favorable income effects are most likely to reduce the need for child labor in the South, even when export goods have a necessity character. However, in very poor economies, aggregate hours of child labor can also increase as a result of more open trade. Although the poorest families are the ones who benefit the most from trade in a Heckscher - Ohlin setting, their income gains might not be high enough to make them withdraw their children from work, while adverse income effects can raise the incidence of child labor among the less poor. The paper provides empirical support for the argument by finding that in a country panel, increases in trade openness are associated with significantly smaller reductions in child labor among the poorest food exporters than among food exporters on average.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 92
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT LABOUR REV
[2]   Is child labor inefficient? [J].
Baland, JM ;
Robinson, JA .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (04) :663-679
[3]  
Basu K, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P412
[4]  
BHALOTRA S, 2003, SOCIAL PROTECTION DI, V317
[5]  
Brown DK, 2003, INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS: HISTORY, THEORY, AND POLICY OPTIONS, P195
[6]  
Brown Drusilla, 1997, FAIR TRADE HARMONIZA, V1, P227
[7]   Does globalization increase child labor? [J].
Cigno, A ;
Rosati, FC ;
Guarcello, L .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 30 (09) :1579-1589
[8]  
DIXIT A, 2000, SOCIAL DIMENSIONS US, P267
[9]   The macroeconomics of child labor regulation [J].
Doepke, M ;
Zilibotti, F .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (05) :1492-1524
[10]   The effect of trade liberalization on child labor [J].
Edmonds, EV ;
Pavcnik, N .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 65 (02) :401-419